The Earnings Smoothing Management Philosophy of BHCs in the SFAS - 133 Framework

Veliota Drakopoulou
{"title":"The Earnings Smoothing Management Philosophy of BHCs in the SFAS - 133 Framework","authors":"Veliota Drakopoulou","doi":"10.5430/AFR.V5N3P64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- The main purpose of this paper is to examine whether or not Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) took advantage of SFAS’s 133 differential treatment of the changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges to smooth earnings. Design/methodology/approach- The author used a causal-comparative research design featuring an investigation on the Income Smoothing effects of BHCs’ corporate use of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and discretionary accruals one year after the 2008 amendment of SFAS 133. Findings- The results of this research showed that SFAS133-Accounting Hedgers had smoother earnings than SFAS133-Compliant Hedgers due to derivative use but did not take advantage of the differential treatment of cash flow hedges to manipulate earnings. This study suggests that hedge accounting rules under SFAS 133 fully determined the hedging behavior of SFAS-Accounting Hedgers . To ascertain the implementation of effective hedges SFAS-Accounting Hedgers captured the benefits of hedge accounting while compromised the economic benefits of hedging in an attempt to manage any associated accounting volatility and smooth earnings. Research limitations/implications- This study extends prior research on corporate risk management activities of BHCs and impacts social change by presenting new evidence on the effects of SFAS 133 cash-flow hedges on earnings smoothing. Practical implications- The evidence suggests that corporate governance mechanisms affect earnings management since BHCs withhold discretion with respect to the realization of gains and losses from derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. This is an indication that BHCs with an intent to achieve smoother earnings as a leading corporate risk management strategy, have a comparative advantage   compared to non-financial institutions to apply hedge accounting since they regularly use derivatives and are more experienced with the implementation of SFAS 133. Originality/value- Although prior studies typically considered derivatives and accruals as substitute proxies in managing reported earnings, the paper’s results suggest that the most significant determinant of earnings smoothing is derivative use for SFAS-Accounting Hedgers and information asymmetry for SFAS133- Compliant Hedgers .","PeriodicalId":181062,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/AFR.V5N3P64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose- The main purpose of this paper is to examine whether or not Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) took advantage of SFAS’s 133 differential treatment of the changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges to smooth earnings. Design/methodology/approach- The author used a causal-comparative research design featuring an investigation on the Income Smoothing effects of BHCs’ corporate use of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and discretionary accruals one year after the 2008 amendment of SFAS 133. Findings- The results of this research showed that SFAS133-Accounting Hedgers had smoother earnings than SFAS133-Compliant Hedgers due to derivative use but did not take advantage of the differential treatment of cash flow hedges to manipulate earnings. This study suggests that hedge accounting rules under SFAS 133 fully determined the hedging behavior of SFAS-Accounting Hedgers . To ascertain the implementation of effective hedges SFAS-Accounting Hedgers captured the benefits of hedge accounting while compromised the economic benefits of hedging in an attempt to manage any associated accounting volatility and smooth earnings. Research limitations/implications- This study extends prior research on corporate risk management activities of BHCs and impacts social change by presenting new evidence on the effects of SFAS 133 cash-flow hedges on earnings smoothing. Practical implications- The evidence suggests that corporate governance mechanisms affect earnings management since BHCs withhold discretion with respect to the realization of gains and losses from derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. This is an indication that BHCs with an intent to achieve smoother earnings as a leading corporate risk management strategy, have a comparative advantage   compared to non-financial institutions to apply hedge accounting since they regularly use derivatives and are more experienced with the implementation of SFAS 133. Originality/value- Although prior studies typically considered derivatives and accruals as substitute proxies in managing reported earnings, the paper’s results suggest that the most significant determinant of earnings smoothing is derivative use for SFAS-Accounting Hedgers and information asymmetry for SFAS133- Compliant Hedgers .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SFAS - 133框架下bhc的盈余平滑管理哲学
目的-本文的主要目的是研究银行控股公司(BHCs)是否利用SFAS对现金流套期保值公允价值变化的133差别处理来平滑盈利。设计/方法/方法-作者采用了因果比较研究设计,调查了在2008年SFAS 133修订一年后,bhc公司使用指定为现金流量套期保值和可支配应计利润的衍生工具的收益平滑效应。研究结果-本研究的结果表明,由于衍生工具的使用,sfas133会计套期保值者比sfas133合规套期保值者的盈余更平滑,但没有利用现金流套期保值的差异处理来操纵盈余。本研究认为,sfas133下的套期会计规则完全决定了sfas133会计套期人的套期行为。为了确定有效套期的实施,会计套期者在试图管理任何相关的会计波动和平稳收益时,在损害套期的经济利益的同时,获取了套期会计的利益。研究局限/启示-本研究通过提出新的证据证明现金流套期保值对盈余平滑的影响,扩展了之前关于BHCs公司风险管理活动和影响社会变革的研究。实际影响-证据表明,公司治理机制影响盈余管理,因为必和必拓对指定为现金流套期保值的衍生工具的损益的实现保留了自由裁量权。这表明,作为领先的企业风险管理策略,有意实现更平稳收益的BHCs与非金融机构相比,在应用套期会计方面具有比较优势,因为它们经常使用衍生品,并且在执行SFAS 133方面更有经验。原创性/价值-尽管先前的研究通常将衍生工具和应计项目视为管理报告盈余的替代代理,但本文的结果表明,盈余平滑的最重要决定因素是SFAS133会计套期者的衍生工具使用和SFAS133合规套期者的信息不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Firms Redact Information from Material Contracts to Conceal Bad News? Forecasting Shares Outstanding How Important Are Semi-Annual Earnings Announcements? An Information Event Perspective Tone at the Bottom: Measuring Corporate Misconduct Risk from the Text of Employee Reviews Hiding in Plain Sight: The Global Implications of Manager Disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1