A Review of Literature and Experimental Evidence on Fraud Motivation: Differentiating Incentive and Pressure

R. Knisley, Hui Lin
{"title":"A Review of Literature and Experimental Evidence on Fraud Motivation: Differentiating Incentive and Pressure","authors":"R. Knisley, Hui Lin","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2020-024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study reviews academic and professional literature on the two types of fraud motivation: incentive and pressure, and provides an in-depth analysis to investigate and differentiate incentive and pressure. The evolution of the professional standards on fraud reveals the need to differentiate incentive and pressure to mitigate fraud. A comprehensive review of academic research uncovers a plethora of fraud research that has studied incentive and pressure either discretely or without differentiation. Few studies have focused on examining and comparing them simultaneously. Theoretically grounded in the fraud triangle and motivation literature, this study synthesizes prior research on incentive and pressure, analyzes the differences by levels of autonomy and regulation. An experiment was conducted and results reveal that incentive and pressure differ in their role in influencing fraudulent intention. Incentive appears to be stronger in influencing fraud intention than pressure. We present the research implications and outline an agenda for future research.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2020-024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reviews academic and professional literature on the two types of fraud motivation: incentive and pressure, and provides an in-depth analysis to investigate and differentiate incentive and pressure. The evolution of the professional standards on fraud reveals the need to differentiate incentive and pressure to mitigate fraud. A comprehensive review of academic research uncovers a plethora of fraud research that has studied incentive and pressure either discretely or without differentiation. Few studies have focused on examining and comparing them simultaneously. Theoretically grounded in the fraud triangle and motivation literature, this study synthesizes prior research on incentive and pressure, analyzes the differences by levels of autonomy and regulation. An experiment was conducted and results reveal that incentive and pressure differ in their role in influencing fraudulent intention. Incentive appears to be stronger in influencing fraud intention than pressure. We present the research implications and outline an agenda for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欺诈动机的文献回顾与实验证据:区分激励与压力
本研究回顾了关于激励和压力两种类型的欺诈动机的学术和专业文献,并对激励和压力进行了深入的分析,以调查和区分激励和压力。欺诈专业标准的演变表明,有必要区分激励和压力,以减轻欺诈。对学术研究的全面回顾揭示了过多的欺诈研究,这些研究要么分立地,要么不加区分地研究激励和压力。很少有研究集中在同时检查和比较它们。本研究以欺诈三角理论和动机文献为理论基础,综合前人对激励和压力的研究,分析了自主和监管水平的差异。实验结果表明,激励和压力在影响欺诈意图中的作用是不同的。激励似乎比压力更能影响欺诈意图。我们提出了研究的意义,并概述了未来研究的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Dark Triad on Organizational Fraud Manufacturing and Fraud: Evidence from Price Competition and Lean Inventories Remembering the Events of the COVID-19 Pandemic Editorial Policy Taxation and Forensic Accounting: Informing Research and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1