Performance Evaluation of Classifiers for Predicting Infection Cases of Dengue Virus Based on Clinical Diagnosis Criteria

A. Fahmi, D. Purwitasari, S. Sumpeno, M. Purnomo
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Classifiers for Predicting Infection Cases of Dengue Virus Based on Clinical Diagnosis Criteria","authors":"A. Fahmi, D. Purwitasari, S. Sumpeno, M. Purnomo","doi":"10.1109/IES50839.2020.9231728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dengue fever caused by dengue virus infection is a severe health threat that can lead to death. In the medical and health field, to classify data, data mining exploitation and classification methods have an essential role in predicting disease. Two main criteria are crucial to diagnosing dengue virus infection, namely the criteria clinical diagnosis and laboratory diagnosis. Dengue infection based on clinical signs and symptoms, as well as laboratory examinations, is made in three clinical diagnosis criteria, which consist of dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). This study was conducted with the primary objective to test and evaluate eight different classification algorithms to find the best algorithm in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Classification algorithm used to predict dengue virus infection cases into three classes of DF, DHF, and DSS based on the performance of accuracy, precision, and recall. The classification algorithm used in this comparison were Neural Networks (NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, and Logistic Regression. The dataset called DBDDKK was collected from the Division of Disease Prevention and Control in the Semarang City Health Office, Central Java, Indonesia. Impute missing values, selection relevant feature, and normalize feature conducted in the preprocessing stage resulted in 14,019 records with 16 attributes for each record. Then the data were split into 70% for training data and 30% for testing data. Cross-validation with the number of folds 10 is applied to validate the accuracy during the dataset training process. The result of the comparison shows that the NN algorithm has the best accuracy that was over other algorithms.","PeriodicalId":344685,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Electronics Symposium (IES)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Electronics Symposium (IES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IES50839.2020.9231728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Dengue fever caused by dengue virus infection is a severe health threat that can lead to death. In the medical and health field, to classify data, data mining exploitation and classification methods have an essential role in predicting disease. Two main criteria are crucial to diagnosing dengue virus infection, namely the criteria clinical diagnosis and laboratory diagnosis. Dengue infection based on clinical signs and symptoms, as well as laboratory examinations, is made in three clinical diagnosis criteria, which consist of dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). This study was conducted with the primary objective to test and evaluate eight different classification algorithms to find the best algorithm in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Classification algorithm used to predict dengue virus infection cases into three classes of DF, DHF, and DSS based on the performance of accuracy, precision, and recall. The classification algorithm used in this comparison were Neural Networks (NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, and Logistic Regression. The dataset called DBDDKK was collected from the Division of Disease Prevention and Control in the Semarang City Health Office, Central Java, Indonesia. Impute missing values, selection relevant feature, and normalize feature conducted in the preprocessing stage resulted in 14,019 records with 16 attributes for each record. Then the data were split into 70% for training data and 30% for testing data. Cross-validation with the number of folds 10 is applied to validate the accuracy during the dataset training process. The result of the comparison shows that the NN algorithm has the best accuracy that was over other algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于临床诊断标准的登革热病毒感染病例分类器性能评价
由登革热病毒感染引起的登革热是一种严重的健康威胁,可导致死亡。在医疗卫生领域,对数据进行分类,数据挖掘开发和分类方法对疾病预测具有至关重要的作用。诊断登革热病毒感染的两个主要标准至关重要,即临床诊断标准和实验室诊断标准。根据临床体征和症状以及实验室检查,对登革热感染进行三种临床诊断标准,包括登革热(DF)、登革出血热(DHF)和登革休克综合征(DSS)。本研究的主要目的是测试和评估八种不同的分类算法,以找到在效率和有效性方面最好的算法。基于准确率、精密度和召回率的分类算法,将登革热病毒感染病例分为DF、DHF和DSS三类。在这个比较中使用的分类算法是神经网络(NN)、支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)、决策树、随机森林、Naïve贝叶斯、AdaBoost和逻辑回归。名为DBDDKK的数据集是从印度尼西亚中爪哇省三宝垄市卫生办公室疾病预防和控制司收集的。在预处理阶段进行缺失值的输入、相关特征的选取、特征的归一化,得到14019条记录,每条记录有16个属性。然后将数据分成70%的训练数据和30%的测试数据。在数据集训练过程中,采用10次交叉验证来验证准确性。对比结果表明,神经网络算法具有较好的准确率,优于其他算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IES 2020 Cover Page Performance Improvement Based on Modified Lossless Quantization (MLQ) for Secret Key Generation Extracted from Received Signal Strength Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols AODV, OLSR and DSDV on MANET using NS3 Particle Swarm Optimization Implementation as MPPT on Hybrid Power System Data Analytics Implementation for Surabaya City Emergency Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1