Laws of Thought and Laws of Logic after Kant

Lydia Patton
{"title":"Laws of Thought and Laws of Logic after Kant","authors":"Lydia Patton","doi":"10.4324/9781351182249-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"George Boole emerged from the British tradition of the “New Analytic”, known for the view that the laws of logic are laws of thought. Logicians in the New Analytic tradition were influenced by the work of Immanuel Kant, and by the German logicians Wilhelm Traugott Krug and Wilhelm Esser, among others. In his 1854 work An Investigation of the Laws of Thought on Which are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities, Boole argues that the laws of thought acquire normative force when constrained to mathematical reasoning. Boole’s motivation is, first, to address issues in the foundations of mathematics, including the relationship between arithmetic and algebra, and the study and application of differential equations (Durand-Richard, van Evra, Panteki). Second, Boole intended to derive the laws of logic from the laws of the operation of the human mind, and to show that these laws were valid of algebra and of logic both, when applied to a restricted domain. Boole’s thorough and flexible work in these areas influenced the development of model theory (see Hodges, forthcoming), and has much in common with contemporary inferentialist approaches to logic (found in, e.g., Peregrin and Resnik).","PeriodicalId":118047,"journal":{"name":"Logic from Kant to Russell","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic from Kant to Russell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351182249-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

George Boole emerged from the British tradition of the “New Analytic”, known for the view that the laws of logic are laws of thought. Logicians in the New Analytic tradition were influenced by the work of Immanuel Kant, and by the German logicians Wilhelm Traugott Krug and Wilhelm Esser, among others. In his 1854 work An Investigation of the Laws of Thought on Which are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities, Boole argues that the laws of thought acquire normative force when constrained to mathematical reasoning. Boole’s motivation is, first, to address issues in the foundations of mathematics, including the relationship between arithmetic and algebra, and the study and application of differential equations (Durand-Richard, van Evra, Panteki). Second, Boole intended to derive the laws of logic from the laws of the operation of the human mind, and to show that these laws were valid of algebra and of logic both, when applied to a restricted domain. Boole’s thorough and flexible work in these areas influenced the development of model theory (see Hodges, forthcoming), and has much in common with contemporary inferentialist approaches to logic (found in, e.g., Peregrin and Resnik).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康德之后的思维规律与逻辑规律
乔治·布尔(George Boole)来自英国的“新分析”传统,该传统以逻辑法则即思维法则的观点而闻名。新分析传统中的逻辑学家受到伊曼努尔·康德以及德国逻辑学家威廉·特劳戈特·克鲁格和威廉·埃塞尔等人的影响。在他1854年的著作《对逻辑与概率的数学理论赖以建立的思维规律的研究》中,布尔认为,思维规律在受到数学推理的约束时获得了规范性的力量。布尔的动机是,首先,解决数学基础问题,包括算术和代数之间的关系,以及微分方程的研究和应用(Durand-Richard, van Evra, Panteki)。其次,布尔打算从人类思维的运行规律中推导出逻辑定律,并证明这些定律在有限的领域内对代数和逻辑都是有效的。布尔在这些领域的彻底和灵活的工作影响了模型理论的发展(见霍奇斯,即将出版),并与当代推理主义的逻辑方法(如Peregrin和Resnik)有很多共同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demystifying Cohen’s Logik What Russell Meant When He Called Moore a Logician Kant’s Excessive Tenderness for Things in the World, and Hegel’s Dialetheism Hegel’s Conception of Thinking in His Logics The Logic in Dedekind’s Logicism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1