Civil Society from Historical to Contemporary Perspectives

Ardian Kastrati
{"title":"Civil Society from Historical to Contemporary Perspectives","authors":"Ardian Kastrati","doi":"10.26417/EJMS.V1I1.P64-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scholars think that because of its ambiguous nature the definition of the civil society concept sometimes is meaningless. Civil society belongs to a group of sociological and political theory concepts such as freedom, justice, equality and democracy that are not clearly demarcated. At least two specific dimensions of the civil society concept are distinguishable: the theoretical and the normative role. In the context of theoretical role the concept of civil society analyzes dimensions of social life and social values, with citizens and civil organizations as key actors. The normative role serves to motivate and mobilize citizens and other social actors for the establishment and development of various contents and forms of civil activities. The normative function is mostly manifested during periods of transition from less to more democratic societies. Both dimensions of the civil society concept have played significant roles, especially in countries where the position of civil society has traditionally played a marginal role. Discussing the concept of civil society is quite fashionable today. Civil society is a popular term with politicians, academics and international agencies. We frequently hear politicians talk about the needs of the state and the market for a civil society. As a result, a number of authors and social and political theorists have stressed its critical importance in the processes of democratic change. The concept of civil society has been defended in various ways by a variety of political and social theorists. Today’s content of civil society does not result with a commonly accepted definition of the term, but focuses on whether the term should be a normative or non-normative tool of social science, and whether economic, religious and family relations should be considered as part of it. This paper will focus on the various meanings of civil society; a tentative definition on civil society will be introduced as well as various existing discourses of civil society.","PeriodicalId":341111,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Civil Society","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/EJMS.V1I1.P64-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many scholars think that because of its ambiguous nature the definition of the civil society concept sometimes is meaningless. Civil society belongs to a group of sociological and political theory concepts such as freedom, justice, equality and democracy that are not clearly demarcated. At least two specific dimensions of the civil society concept are distinguishable: the theoretical and the normative role. In the context of theoretical role the concept of civil society analyzes dimensions of social life and social values, with citizens and civil organizations as key actors. The normative role serves to motivate and mobilize citizens and other social actors for the establishment and development of various contents and forms of civil activities. The normative function is mostly manifested during periods of transition from less to more democratic societies. Both dimensions of the civil society concept have played significant roles, especially in countries where the position of civil society has traditionally played a marginal role. Discussing the concept of civil society is quite fashionable today. Civil society is a popular term with politicians, academics and international agencies. We frequently hear politicians talk about the needs of the state and the market for a civil society. As a result, a number of authors and social and political theorists have stressed its critical importance in the processes of democratic change. The concept of civil society has been defended in various ways by a variety of political and social theorists. Today’s content of civil society does not result with a commonly accepted definition of the term, but focuses on whether the term should be a normative or non-normative tool of social science, and whether economic, religious and family relations should be considered as part of it. This paper will focus on the various meanings of civil society; a tentative definition on civil society will be introduced as well as various existing discourses of civil society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从历史到当代的视角看公民社会
许多学者认为,由于市民社会概念的模糊性,其定义有时是没有意义的。公民社会属于一组社会学和政治学的概念,如自由、正义、平等和民主,没有明确的界限。公民社会概念至少有两个具体维度是可以区分的:理论角色和规范角色。在理论角色的背景下,公民社会的概念分析了社会生活和社会价值的各个方面,公民和公民组织是关键角色。规范的作用是激励和动员公民和其他社会行动者建立和发展各种内容和形式的公民活动。规范功能主要表现在社会从民主程度较低向民主程度较高的过渡时期。民间社会概念的两个方面都发挥了重要作用,特别是在民间社会地位传统上起边缘作用的国家。讨论公民社会的概念在今天是相当时髦的。公民社会是政治家、学者和国际机构常用的一个术语。我们经常听到政客们谈论国家和市场对公民社会的需求。因此,一些作家和社会和政治理论家强调了它在民主变革进程中的关键重要性。市民社会的概念已经被各种各样的政治和社会理论家以各种方式辩护。今天关于公民社会的内容,并不是一个被普遍接受的术语定义,而是关注这个术语是否应该成为社会科学的规范性或非规范性工具,以及经济、宗教和家庭关系是否应该被视为其中的一部分。本文将重点讨论市民社会的各种含义;本文将对市民社会的概念进行尝试性的界定,并对现有的各种市民社会话语进行梳理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ecofeminist Energy Illiteracy: Greta in Alberta Oil Country Authoritarian Impediments to Civil Society in Contemporary Myanmar: Findings from the Myanmar Civil Society Survey 2019 Social Status and Charitable Giving in Pakistan: The Role of Gratitude, Reciprocity Beliefs, and Behaviors Helping Oneself, Helping Each Other: Correlates of Women's Participation in Self-Help Groups in India A Theoretical Framework of the Relationship between Celebrity Endorsement and Charity Donations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1