Evaluating the Accuracy of Password Strength Meters using Off-The-Shelf Guessing Attacks

David Pereira, J. Ferreira, A. Mendes
{"title":"Evaluating the Accuracy of Password Strength Meters using Off-The-Shelf Guessing Attacks","authors":"David Pereira, J. Ferreira, A. Mendes","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW51248.2020.00079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we measure the accuracy of password strength meters (PSMs) using password guessing resistance against off-the-shelf guessing attacks. We consider 13 PSMs, 5 different attack tools, and a random selection of 60,000 passwords extracted from three different datasets of real-world password leaks. Our results show that a significant percentage of passwords classified as strong were cracked, thus suggesting that current password strength estimation methods can be improved.","PeriodicalId":202247,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW51248.2020.00079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper we measure the accuracy of password strength meters (PSMs) using password guessing resistance against off-the-shelf guessing attacks. We consider 13 PSMs, 5 different attack tools, and a random selection of 60,000 passwords extracted from three different datasets of real-world password leaks. Our results show that a significant percentage of passwords classified as strong were cracked, thus suggesting that current password strength estimation methods can be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用现成的猜测攻击评估密码强度计的准确性
在本文中,我们使用密码猜测抵抗现成的猜测攻击来衡量密码强度计(psm)的准确性。我们考虑了13个psm, 5种不同的攻击工具,以及从三个不同的真实世界密码泄露数据集中随机抽取的60,000个密码。我们的研究结果表明,被分类为强的密码中有很大比例被破解,这表明目前的密码强度估计方法可以得到改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BP-IDS: Using business process specification to leverage intrusion detection in critical infrastructures Techniques and Tools for Advanced Software Vulnerability Detection Challenges Faced with Application Performance Monitoring (APM) when Migrating to the Cloud AHPCap: A Framework for Automated Hardware Profiling and Capture of Mobile Application States Unit Lemmas for Detecting Requirement and Specification Flaws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1