Defining the ergonomic buzzwords

ACM '83 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/800173.809707
J. Meads
{"title":"Defining the ergonomic buzzwords","authors":"J. Meads","doi":"10.1145/800173.809707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current software and computer systems are being advertised and sold today as FRIENDLY systems that are EASY TO USE. Most also claim to be EASY TO LEARN as well. But what is it that makes a system FRIENDLY, EASY TO USE, or EASY TO LEARN? Is it sufficient to enshrine a group of interactive features in a video box connected to a single user microcomputer? If a system is EASY TO USE does that make it FRIENDLY? Or does EASY TO LEARN mean that it is EASY TO USE? Does your friendly, easy-going personal computer salesman differentiate between these terms!\n Although the physical aspects of human factors have been studied for several decades and have an established scientific base, there is very little published material on the software aspects of ergonomics that is based upon well controlled experimental investigation. However, there is a fair amount of literature in which individuals describe their experiences in various ad hoc situations. The similarities among these experiences has resulted in a fair amount of “folklore” which may be beneficially applied. The terms: EASY TO LEARN, EASY TO USE, and FRIENDLY are defined below according to this experiential base.","PeriodicalId":306306,"journal":{"name":"ACM '83","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '83","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800173.809707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Current software and computer systems are being advertised and sold today as FRIENDLY systems that are EASY TO USE. Most also claim to be EASY TO LEARN as well. But what is it that makes a system FRIENDLY, EASY TO USE, or EASY TO LEARN? Is it sufficient to enshrine a group of interactive features in a video box connected to a single user microcomputer? If a system is EASY TO USE does that make it FRIENDLY? Or does EASY TO LEARN mean that it is EASY TO USE? Does your friendly, easy-going personal computer salesman differentiate between these terms! Although the physical aspects of human factors have been studied for several decades and have an established scientific base, there is very little published material on the software aspects of ergonomics that is based upon well controlled experimental investigation. However, there is a fair amount of literature in which individuals describe their experiences in various ad hoc situations. The similarities among these experiences has resulted in a fair amount of “folklore” which may be beneficially applied. The terms: EASY TO LEARN, EASY TO USE, and FRIENDLY are defined below according to this experiential base.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义人体工程学流行语
当前的软件和计算机系统都被宣传为易于使用的友好系统。大多数也声称很容易学。但是,是什么使系统友好、易于使用或易于学习呢?将一组交互功能嵌入到连接到单个用户微型计算机的视频盒中是否足够?如果一个系统很容易使用,那么它是否就很友好?还是说EASY TO LEARN意味着它很容易使用?你们友好、随和的个人电脑推销员能区分这些术语吗?虽然人类因素的物理方面已经研究了几十年,并有一个建立的科学基础,但很少有基于良好控制的实验调查的人体工程学软件方面的出版材料。然而,有相当数量的文献中,个人描述了他们在各种特殊情况下的经历。这些经验之间的相似之处导致了相当数量的“民间传说”,可以有益地应用。术语:易学、易使用和友好是根据这个经验基础定义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optical storage of page images and pictorial data - opportunities and needed advances in information retrieval Office automation and the changing definition of the workplace Why Ada is not just another programming language Session M4: Women in the workplace Network protocol: A structured approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1