An Investigation into Goodness of Zakat Laws in Selected Countries

M. Obaidullah
{"title":"An Investigation into Goodness of Zakat Laws in Selected Countries","authors":"M. Obaidullah","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3303694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zakat as an annual flow of charity funds has received increasing attention of financial regulators and policy makers. Unlike other forms of Islamic philanthropy, zakat is mandated and compulsorily levied on every high-net-worth Muslim. Its primary goal is to serve as a tool to provide for the basic needs of the poor and the needy. Traditionally, most Muslim societies have viewed zakat as a purely religious matter. In such countries, zakat is managed entirely by the state apparatus dealing with religious affairs of its people. In some other countries with secularism as the avowed policy, the state sees no role for itself in religious matters and leaves the same to individuals and non-state actors. In yet another set of countries, the state sees the importance of a proactive role for itself in zakat management even while the task of zakat collection and distribution remains in the private domain. These countries have witnessed an increasing integration of zakat with the financial system. This paper hypothesizes that the regulatory framework for zakat management has an important bearing upon the mobilization of such funds and their utilization for alleviation of poverty. Using the concept of “goodness of laws” it undertakes a comparative analysis of the 29 sets of zakat laws as they exist in eight countries across the globe and seeks to delineate the “core principles” that should form the basis of legal and regulatory reforms that are necessary to strengthen the sector","PeriodicalId":269513,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Law & Law of the Muslim World eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Law & Law of the Muslim World eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3303694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Zakat as an annual flow of charity funds has received increasing attention of financial regulators and policy makers. Unlike other forms of Islamic philanthropy, zakat is mandated and compulsorily levied on every high-net-worth Muslim. Its primary goal is to serve as a tool to provide for the basic needs of the poor and the needy. Traditionally, most Muslim societies have viewed zakat as a purely religious matter. In such countries, zakat is managed entirely by the state apparatus dealing with religious affairs of its people. In some other countries with secularism as the avowed policy, the state sees no role for itself in religious matters and leaves the same to individuals and non-state actors. In yet another set of countries, the state sees the importance of a proactive role for itself in zakat management even while the task of zakat collection and distribution remains in the private domain. These countries have witnessed an increasing integration of zakat with the financial system. This paper hypothesizes that the regulatory framework for zakat management has an important bearing upon the mobilization of such funds and their utilization for alleviation of poverty. Using the concept of “goodness of laws” it undertakes a comparative analysis of the 29 sets of zakat laws as they exist in eight countries across the globe and seeks to delineate the “core principles” that should form the basis of legal and regulatory reforms that are necessary to strengthen the sector
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
若干国家天课法善性考察
天课作为慈善资金的年度流动,越来越受到金融监管机构和政策制定者的关注。与其他形式的伊斯兰慈善不同,天课是强制征收给每个高净值穆斯林的。它的主要目标是作为一种工具,为穷人和有需要的人提供基本需要。传统上,大多数穆斯林社会将天课视为纯粹的宗教问题。在这些国家,天课完全由处理其人民宗教事务的国家机器管理。在其他一些以世俗主义为公开政策的国家,国家认为自己在宗教事务中没有任何作用,而把同样的事情留给个人和非国家行为者。在另一些国家,政府看到了自己在天课管理中发挥积极作用的重要性,尽管收集和分发天课的任务仍然属于私人领域。这些国家见证了天课与金融体系的日益融合。本文假设,天课管理的监管框架对此类资金的动员及其用于减轻贫困的利用具有重要影响。利用“法律之善”的概念,它对全球8个国家存在的29套天课法律进行了比较分析,并试图划定“核心原则”,这些原则应构成加强该部门所需的法律和监管改革的基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Money Laundering from Maqāsid Al-Sharī‘Ah Perspective with Particular Reference to Preservation of Wealth (Hifz Al-Mal) Debtor’s Legal Standing in the Possession of Fiduciary Collateral in Indonesia The Immigrant Next Door: Exposure, Prejudice, and Altruism FIQH as a Source of Contemporary Law in Arab Countries Legal and Illegal Earning in Islam: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1