Exploring how expert and novice evaluators perceive G4H to consolidate heuristic evaluation

José Cezar de Souza Filho, A. L. Sampaio, I. Monteiro, P. Jucá
{"title":"Exploring how expert and novice evaluators perceive G4H to consolidate heuristic evaluation","authors":"José Cezar de Souza Filho, A. L. Sampaio, I. Monteiro, P. Jucá","doi":"10.1145/3357155.3358469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Game for Heuristic Evaluation (G4H) is a gamification technique designed to increase the evaluators' motivation and engagement during the Heuristic Evaluation (HE) consolidation. The preliminary study conducted to validate G4H has shown promising results for improving evaluators' motivation and satisfaction, however, G4H needed further evaluation considering other subjects. In this paper, we present an exploratory study carried out to investigate the G4H effectiveness for expert and novice evaluators and identify the perceptions that they have on G4H use in HE consolidation. The study was subdivided into two parts: experts are subjects in Study A and novices are subjects in Study B. In each study we conducting a user study to investigate the G4H use by the participants, and then performing a focus group to collect the participant's perceptions regarding G4H use. Our findings indicate that G4H fulfill the intention to improve motivation, satisfaction, and collaborative work, but had a different impact on experts and novices. Experts used G4H to systematize the HE consolidation tasks, and novices perceive G4H as a ludic approach to consolidate HE.","PeriodicalId":237718,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3357155.3358469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Game for Heuristic Evaluation (G4H) is a gamification technique designed to increase the evaluators' motivation and engagement during the Heuristic Evaluation (HE) consolidation. The preliminary study conducted to validate G4H has shown promising results for improving evaluators' motivation and satisfaction, however, G4H needed further evaluation considering other subjects. In this paper, we present an exploratory study carried out to investigate the G4H effectiveness for expert and novice evaluators and identify the perceptions that they have on G4H use in HE consolidation. The study was subdivided into two parts: experts are subjects in Study A and novices are subjects in Study B. In each study we conducting a user study to investigate the G4H use by the participants, and then performing a focus group to collect the participant's perceptions regarding G4H use. Our findings indicate that G4H fulfill the intention to improve motivation, satisfaction, and collaborative work, but had a different impact on experts and novices. Experts used G4H to systematize the HE consolidation tasks, and novices perceive G4H as a ludic approach to consolidate HE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索专家和新手评价者如何感知G4H以巩固启发式评价
启发式评估游戏(Game for Heuristic Evaluation, G4H)是一种游戏化技术,旨在提高评估者在启发式评估巩固过程中的动机和参与度。为验证G4H而进行的初步研究在提高评价者的动机和满意度方面显示出良好的效果,但G4H还需要考虑其他课题进行进一步的评价。在本文中,我们提出了一项探索性研究,以调查专家和新手评估者的G4H有效性,并确定他们对G4H在HE巩固中的使用的看法。该研究被细分为两部分:专家是研究A的研究对象,新手是研究b的研究对象。在每个研究中,我们进行用户研究,调查参与者使用G4H的情况,然后进行焦点小组,收集参与者对G4H使用的看法。我们的研究结果表明,G4H实现了提高动机、满意度和协同工作的意图,但对专家和新手的影响不同。专家使用G4H将HE整合任务系统化,新手认为G4H是整合HE的一种有趣的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Art accessibility for blind people: a process to create and understand photography CargoAffect Creating chatbots to talk with humans: HCI evaluations and perspectives Scope and definition of user experience in Brazil: a survey to explore community's perspectives Open design: a systematic mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1