Breaking out of strategy vectors: reintroducing culture

J. Balogun, S. Floyd
{"title":"Breaking out of strategy vectors: reintroducing culture","authors":"J. Balogun, S. Floyd","doi":"10.1108/S0897-3016(2010)0000018006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is considerable evidence that long periods of success in organisations can lead to ossification of strategy and strategic inertia. Burgelman (2002) shows how co-evolutionary lock-in occurs through the creation of a strategy vector. He demonstrates that the internal selection environment can become configured to create sources of inertia that dampen the autonomous strategy process, driving out unrelated exploration and creating a dominance of the induced, top-down strategy process. While this study shows how lock-in occurs, it does not address how a company breaks out of co-evolutionary lock-in. This is the focus of this paper. We argue that to understand how an organisation breaks out of a strategy vector a more complete conceptualisation of the structural context, and in particular the under specified cultural mechanisms, is required. It also requires an understanding of the linkages between the structural context and the new core capabilities required for breakout. Thus we first expand on what is known about strategy vectors and review research from the strategy process tradition that explores the linkages between strategy, culture and strategic change, to build a more comprehensive picture of the structural context. Our model demonstrates the extent of interconnectedness between the ‘hard’ (e.g., control systems and organisation structure) and ‘soft’ (e.g. beliefs, symbols and stories) components, and that development of new required capabilities is dependent on a holistic shift in all these aspects of the structural context, including, therefore, change in the organisation's culture. We then illustrate the link between lock-in, capability development and culture change through the case of the famous Formula One team, Ferrari. We finish with a discussion of the implications of our findings for strategic change.","PeriodicalId":270361,"journal":{"name":"Research in Organizational Change and Development","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Organizational Change and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-3016(2010)0000018006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that long periods of success in organisations can lead to ossification of strategy and strategic inertia. Burgelman (2002) shows how co-evolutionary lock-in occurs through the creation of a strategy vector. He demonstrates that the internal selection environment can become configured to create sources of inertia that dampen the autonomous strategy process, driving out unrelated exploration and creating a dominance of the induced, top-down strategy process. While this study shows how lock-in occurs, it does not address how a company breaks out of co-evolutionary lock-in. This is the focus of this paper. We argue that to understand how an organisation breaks out of a strategy vector a more complete conceptualisation of the structural context, and in particular the under specified cultural mechanisms, is required. It also requires an understanding of the linkages between the structural context and the new core capabilities required for breakout. Thus we first expand on what is known about strategy vectors and review research from the strategy process tradition that explores the linkages between strategy, culture and strategic change, to build a more comprehensive picture of the structural context. Our model demonstrates the extent of interconnectedness between the ‘hard’ (e.g., control systems and organisation structure) and ‘soft’ (e.g. beliefs, symbols and stories) components, and that development of new required capabilities is dependent on a holistic shift in all these aspects of the structural context, including, therefore, change in the organisation's culture. We then illustrate the link between lock-in, capability development and culture change through the case of the famous Formula One team, Ferrari. We finish with a discussion of the implications of our findings for strategic change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突破战略向量:重新引入文化
有相当多的证据表明,组织长期的成功会导致战略僵化和战略惰性。Burgelman(2002)展示了共同进化锁定是如何通过创建策略向量发生的。他证明,内部选择环境可以被配置为产生惯性来源,从而抑制自主战略过程,驱逐不相关的探索,并创造出诱导的、自上而下的战略过程的主导地位。虽然这项研究显示了锁定是如何发生的,但它并没有解决公司如何摆脱共同进化锁定的问题。这是本文的重点。我们认为,要理解一个组织如何打破战略矢量,需要对结构背景,特别是特定的文化机制进行更完整的概念化。它还需要理解结构背景与突破所需的新核心能力之间的联系。因此,我们首先扩展已知的战略向量,并回顾战略过程传统的研究,探索战略、文化和战略变革之间的联系,以建立一个更全面的结构背景。我们的模型展示了“硬”组件(如控制系统和组织结构)和“软”组件(如信仰、符号和故事)之间的相互联系程度,以及新所需能力的开发依赖于结构背景中所有这些方面的整体转变,因此包括组织文化的变化。然后,我们通过著名的一级方程式车队法拉利的案例来说明锁定、能力发展和文化变革之间的联系。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究结果对战略变革的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing for Collaboration: Don't Just Focus on the Team, Focus Also on the Context in Which Teams Work Opening the Doors of the Ivory Tower: Action Research as a Tool Supporting Cooperation between Universities and External Organizations Are OD and Analytics Twins Separated at Birth? Toward an Integrated Framework From Psychological Dispositions to Social Positions: Applying a Habitus-oriented Approach to Organization Development and Change Prelims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1