Game-theoretic modeling of DDoS attacks in cloud computing

Kaho Wan, Joel Coffman
{"title":"Game-theoretic modeling of DDoS attacks in cloud computing","authors":"Kaho Wan, Joel Coffman","doi":"10.1145/3468737.3494093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefits of cloud computing have attracted many organizations to migrate their IT infrastructures into the cloud. In an infrastructure as a service (IaaS) model, the cloud service provider offers services to multiple consumers using shared physical hardware resources. However, by sharing a cloud environment with other consumers, organizations may also share security risks with their cotenants. Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are considered one of the major security threats in cloud computing. Without a proper defense mechanism, an attack against one tenant can also affect the availability of cotenants. This work uses a game-theoretic approach to analyze the interactions between various entities when the cloud is under attack. The resulting Nash equilibrium shows that collateral damage to cotenants is unlikely if the cloud service provider is unbiased and chooses a rational strategy, but the Nash equilibrium can change when the cloud service provider does not treat cloud consumers equally. The cloud service provider's bias can influence its strategy selection and create a situation where untargeted users suffer unnecessary collateral damage from DDoS attacks.","PeriodicalId":254382,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3468737.3494093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The benefits of cloud computing have attracted many organizations to migrate their IT infrastructures into the cloud. In an infrastructure as a service (IaaS) model, the cloud service provider offers services to multiple consumers using shared physical hardware resources. However, by sharing a cloud environment with other consumers, organizations may also share security risks with their cotenants. Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are considered one of the major security threats in cloud computing. Without a proper defense mechanism, an attack against one tenant can also affect the availability of cotenants. This work uses a game-theoretic approach to analyze the interactions between various entities when the cloud is under attack. The resulting Nash equilibrium shows that collateral damage to cotenants is unlikely if the cloud service provider is unbiased and chooses a rational strategy, but the Nash equilibrium can change when the cloud service provider does not treat cloud consumers equally. The cloud service provider's bias can influence its strategy selection and create a situation where untargeted users suffer unnecessary collateral damage from DDoS attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
云计算中DDoS攻击的博弈论建模
云计算的好处吸引了许多组织将其IT基础设施迁移到云中。在基础设施即服务(IaaS)模型中,云服务提供商使用共享的物理硬件资源向多个消费者提供服务。然而,通过与其他消费者共享云环境,组织也可能与其合作者共享安全风险。分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击被认为是云计算中的主要安全威胁之一。如果没有适当的防御机制,对一个租户的攻击也会影响租户的可用性。这项工作使用博弈论的方法来分析云受到攻击时各种实体之间的相互作用。由此产生的纳什均衡表明,如果云服务提供商没有偏见并选择了理性的策略,则不太可能对协约造成附带损害,但当云服务提供商不平等对待云消费者时,纳什均衡可能会发生变化。云服务提供商的偏见会影响其战略选择,并造成非目标用户遭受DDoS攻击的不必要附带损害的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distributed federated service chaining for heterogeneous network environments Accord RDS Leveraging vCPU-utilization rates to select cost-efficient VMs for parallel workloads Multi-cloud serverless function composition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1