Experimental Investigation of Various Shell Footings in Cohesive and Cohesionless Soil

Kumar M, Subagiriraj M
{"title":"Experimental Investigation of Various Shell Footings in Cohesive and Cohesionless Soil","authors":"Kumar M, Subagiriraj M","doi":"10.34256/IJCEAE19110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing demand of infrastructure development leads to the usage of sandy soils; which possess low bearing capacity. In this regard, this study is to provide a novel solution to counteract the problems faced by the weak soil. The experimental study was carried out on both Flat and Shell models with the corresponding Triangular, Square and Hexagon shapes for both loose and medium dense condition. The models were compared based on their equal plan area. To carry out the experimental work, a model tank of cylindrical shape of dimensions of 50cm diameter and 50 cm height is used. Vertical load were applied to the models and the corresponding settlement were observed. The ultimate load carrying capacity of footing models was calculated and plotted by the load versus settlement graph. From the results, Improvement factor on vertical load carrying of Flat Square footing is 1.75 on loose sand. In dense sand the improvement factor of Flat Square is 1.67. The efficiency of pyramidal shell is 75% and 66.7% on counter flat footing on loose sand and dense sand condition respectively. The settlement characteristic of triangular shell is better than other models on both loose and medium dense conditions. The load carrying capacity and efficiency of square footing having more value among other footing models for both low and medium consistency of clay. In sand the efficiency of shell is greater than in clayey soil, so the shell footings performing better way in sandy soil.","PeriodicalId":154319,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil, Environmental and Agricultural Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil, Environmental and Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34256/IJCEAE19110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The increasing demand of infrastructure development leads to the usage of sandy soils; which possess low bearing capacity. In this regard, this study is to provide a novel solution to counteract the problems faced by the weak soil. The experimental study was carried out on both Flat and Shell models with the corresponding Triangular, Square and Hexagon shapes for both loose and medium dense condition. The models were compared based on their equal plan area. To carry out the experimental work, a model tank of cylindrical shape of dimensions of 50cm diameter and 50 cm height is used. Vertical load were applied to the models and the corresponding settlement were observed. The ultimate load carrying capacity of footing models was calculated and plotted by the load versus settlement graph. From the results, Improvement factor on vertical load carrying of Flat Square footing is 1.75 on loose sand. In dense sand the improvement factor of Flat Square is 1.67. The efficiency of pyramidal shell is 75% and 66.7% on counter flat footing on loose sand and dense sand condition respectively. The settlement characteristic of triangular shell is better than other models on both loose and medium dense conditions. The load carrying capacity and efficiency of square footing having more value among other footing models for both low and medium consistency of clay. In sand the efficiency of shell is greater than in clayey soil, so the shell footings performing better way in sandy soil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘性和非粘性土中不同壳基的试验研究
基础设施建设需求的增加导致砂土的利用;承载能力较低。在这方面,本研究旨在为解决软弱土面临的问题提供一种新的解决方案。在松散和中密度条件下,分别对具有相应三角形、正方形和六边形形状的Flat和Shell模型进行了实验研究。在平面面积相等的基础上对模型进行比较。为了进行实验工作,使用了一个直径50cm,高度50cm的圆柱形模型罐。竖向荷载作用于模型上,观察相应的沉降。采用荷载沉降图计算并绘制了地基模型的极限承载能力。结果表明,在松散砂土条件下,平方基的竖向承载力改善系数为1.75。在致密砂中,Flat Square的改进系数为1.67。在松散砂和致密砂条件下,锥体壳在反平基础上的效率分别为75%和66.7%。三角形壳在松散和中密度条件下的沉降特性都优于其他模型。对于中、低黏性土,方基的承载能力和效率在其他基础模型中更有价值。在砂土中,壳基的效率比在粘性土中要高,因此在砂土中,壳基的表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Trend in Groundwater-Quality Parameters: A Case Study The utilisation of End-of-Life Plastics for the production of paver blocks: A waste management and disposal strategy Hill Women-led Spring Water Management in Darjeeling Himalayan Region, West Bengal Preliminary observation of bacterial biofilm communities on plastic litters and their surface degradation in two coastal areas of Tuticorin, India Quantification and characterisation of microplastic pollution and its ecological risk in the coastline of Tuticorin, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1