A Comparison of Two Data-Driven Models to Predict Hypolimnetic Dissolved Oxygen Concentration: A Case Study of the Seymareh Reservoir in Iran

A. K. Nokhandan, E. Snieder, U. Khan, A. Eldyasti, Z. Ghaemi, M. Bagheri
{"title":"A Comparison of Two Data-Driven Models to Predict Hypolimnetic Dissolved Oxygen Concentration: A Case Study of the Seymareh Reservoir in Iran","authors":"A. K. Nokhandan, E. Snieder, U. Khan, A. Eldyasti, Z. Ghaemi, M. Bagheri","doi":"10.3808/jeil.201900017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) is a crucial factor in maintaining aquatic ecosystem health. In this research, two data-driven modelling (DDM) techniques, multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN), were developed, implemented and compared to predict the DO in the hypolimnetic layer of Seymareh Reservoir in Iran. Low DO in this Reservoir lead to a fish kill event and thus, this reservoir is of interest to water managers in the region. Water quality monitoring data from the Reservoir and an upstream river were used for training the models. In addition, two input variable selection methods, linear correlation analysis and combined neural pathway strength analysis (CNPSA, a nonlinear variable selection method) were developed and compared to determine the most significant inputs to predict hypolimnetic DO. A systematic method to select the optimum architecture of the network is proposed and tested. While these two approaches have been investigated previously, this research focuses on creating a systematic approach to combining two sources of uncertainty of DDM models. Additionally, the performance of CNPSA has not been compared to linear variable selection techniques. This research demonstrates the importance of using systematic input selection and network design for improved DO prediction in a large Reservoir. The performance of the models was quantified using the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and root mean squared error, which demonstrated that the ANN approach had better performance compared to the MLR model. The approach demonstrates that by using a systematic input variable selection approach combined with an optimised network architecture, a high performance of DO prediction can be achieved using easily measured upstream input data.","PeriodicalId":143718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3808/jeil.201900017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) is a crucial factor in maintaining aquatic ecosystem health. In this research, two data-driven modelling (DDM) techniques, multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN), were developed, implemented and compared to predict the DO in the hypolimnetic layer of Seymareh Reservoir in Iran. Low DO in this Reservoir lead to a fish kill event and thus, this reservoir is of interest to water managers in the region. Water quality monitoring data from the Reservoir and an upstream river were used for training the models. In addition, two input variable selection methods, linear correlation analysis and combined neural pathway strength analysis (CNPSA, a nonlinear variable selection method) were developed and compared to determine the most significant inputs to predict hypolimnetic DO. A systematic method to select the optimum architecture of the network is proposed and tested. While these two approaches have been investigated previously, this research focuses on creating a systematic approach to combining two sources of uncertainty of DDM models. Additionally, the performance of CNPSA has not been compared to linear variable selection techniques. This research demonstrates the importance of using systematic input selection and network design for improved DO prediction in a large Reservoir. The performance of the models was quantified using the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and root mean squared error, which demonstrated that the ANN approach had better performance compared to the MLR model. The approach demonstrates that by using a systematic input variable selection approach combined with an optimised network architecture, a high performance of DO prediction can be achieved using easily measured upstream input data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种数据驱动模型预测低氧溶解氧浓度的比较——以伊朗Seymareh油藏为例
溶解氧浓度(DO)是维持水生生态系统健康的关键因素。本研究采用多元线性回归(MLR)和人工神经网络(ANN)两种数据驱动建模(DDM)技术,对伊朗Seymareh油藏低渗层的DO进行了预测,并进行了比较。该水库的低DO导致鱼类死亡事件,因此,该水库引起了该地区水资源管理者的兴趣。使用水库和上游河流的水质监测数据来训练模型。此外,我们开发了两种输入变量选择方法,线性相关分析和联合神经通路强度分析(CNPSA,一种非线性变量选择方法),并进行了比较,以确定预测低代谢DO的最显著输入。提出了一种系统的网络结构选择方法,并进行了试验。虽然这两种方法之前已经被研究过,但本研究的重点是创建一种系统的方法来结合DDM模型的两种不确定性来源。此外,CNPSA的性能还没有与线性变量选择技术进行比较。该研究表明,采用系统的输入选择和网络设计对于改进大型水库的DO预测具有重要意义。使用Nash-Sutcliffe效率和均方根误差对模型的性能进行了量化,结果表明,与MLR模型相比,人工神经网络方法具有更好的性能。该方法表明,通过使用系统的输入变量选择方法与优化的网络架构相结合,可以使用易于测量的上游输入数据实现高性能的DO预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extending Simulation Decomposition Analysis into Systemic Risk Planning for Domino-Like Cascading Effects in Environmental Systems Tracing Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction in China’s Transportation Sector Extreme Summer Precipitation Events in China and Their Changes during 1982 ~ 2019 Characteristics of Seasonal Frozen Soil in Hetao Irrigation District under Climate Change Distribution Characteristics of Soil Moisture in the Three Rivers Headwaters Region, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1