{"title":"Analysis of SAW reflection","authors":"H. Robinson, Y. Hahn, J. N. Gau","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.1988.49356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study of perturbative and variational approaches is carried out for SAW (surface acoustic wave) reflections. It is shown that the perturbation treatment and variational formulation are mutually consistent. These two approaches yield nearly identical results for the reflection coefficients and velocity shifts due to metal finger and groove overlays. The on- and off-resonance behavior of the reflection coefficient can be described correctly using either one of these theories, with inclusion of the overlay shape dependence to account for off-resonance effects. The variational approach lends itself more readily to analysis of arbitrary grating structures since no complicated boundary terms appear, and it also can include higher-order effects neglected in first-order perturbation theory by a judicious choice of the trial function. But the utility of the variational principle is limited in calculating physically meaningful results by the accuracy of the trial functions used.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":263198,"journal":{"name":"IEEE 1988 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE 1988 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1988.49356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
A study of perturbative and variational approaches is carried out for SAW (surface acoustic wave) reflections. It is shown that the perturbation treatment and variational formulation are mutually consistent. These two approaches yield nearly identical results for the reflection coefficients and velocity shifts due to metal finger and groove overlays. The on- and off-resonance behavior of the reflection coefficient can be described correctly using either one of these theories, with inclusion of the overlay shape dependence to account for off-resonance effects. The variational approach lends itself more readily to analysis of arbitrary grating structures since no complicated boundary terms appear, and it also can include higher-order effects neglected in first-order perturbation theory by a judicious choice of the trial function. But the utility of the variational principle is limited in calculating physically meaningful results by the accuracy of the trial functions used.<>
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
