Acute effects of morphine and chlorpromazine on the acquisition of shuttle box conditioned avoidance response.

A M Ageel, L Chin, C L Trafton, B C Jones, A L Picchioni
{"title":"Acute effects of morphine and chlorpromazine on the acquisition of shuttle box conditioned avoidance response.","authors":"A M Ageel,&nbsp;L Chin,&nbsp;C L Trafton,&nbsp;B C Jones,&nbsp;A L Picchioni","doi":"10.1007/BF00421120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morphine sulfate, 0.25-24.0 mg/kg, or chlorpromazine hydrochloride, 0.0625-4.0mg/kg were administered subcutaneously to naive rats 30 min prior to the start of massed-trials conditioned avoidance response (CAR) testing. The graded doses of both drugs were applied in each of three CAR task difficulty levels created by manipulation of the duration of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, intertrial interval and shock intensity. Chlorpromazine, in a dose-related manner, caused a decrement in CAR acquisition in all tasks. Morphine, in comparison, produced a biphasic dose response. For a given task difficulty, low doses of morphine enhanced acquisition, whereas higher doses inhibited acquisition. With increasing task difficulty, relatively larger doses of morphine were required to inhibit or facilitate acquisition of CAR. These results emphasize the need to consider not only drug dosage levels, but also the interaction of task difficulty in the application of drugs in learning paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20715,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00421120","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Morphine sulfate, 0.25-24.0 mg/kg, or chlorpromazine hydrochloride, 0.0625-4.0mg/kg were administered subcutaneously to naive rats 30 min prior to the start of massed-trials conditioned avoidance response (CAR) testing. The graded doses of both drugs were applied in each of three CAR task difficulty levels created by manipulation of the duration of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, intertrial interval and shock intensity. Chlorpromazine, in a dose-related manner, caused a decrement in CAR acquisition in all tasks. Morphine, in comparison, produced a biphasic dose response. For a given task difficulty, low doses of morphine enhanced acquisition, whereas higher doses inhibited acquisition. With increasing task difficulty, relatively larger doses of morphine were required to inhibit or facilitate acquisition of CAR. These results emphasize the need to consider not only drug dosage levels, but also the interaction of task difficulty in the application of drugs in learning paradigms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吗啡和氯丙嗪对穿梭箱条件回避反应获得的急性影响。
在大规模试验条件回避反应(CAR)试验开始前30 min,给药硫酸吗啡0.25 ~ 24.0 mg/kg或盐酸氯丙嗪0.0625 ~ 4.0mg/kg。两种药物的分级剂量分别应用于三个CAR任务难度水平,这些难度水平是由条件刺激和非条件刺激的持续时间、试验间隔和电击强度的操纵产生的。氯丙嗪以剂量相关的方式导致所有任务中CAR获得的减少。相比之下,吗啡产生了双相剂量反应。对于给定的任务难度,低剂量吗啡增强习得,而高剂量吗啡抑制习得。随着任务难度的增加,需要相对较大剂量的吗啡来抑制或促进CAR的获得。这些结果强调,不仅需要考虑药物剂量水平,还需要考虑任务难度在药物应用学习范式中的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical background for clinical drug effect Long term effects of psychotropic drugs Social implications of psychopharmacology Straiatum and neuroleptics Biochemical findings in mental illness. Affective disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1