U.S. public transportation ridership analysis and prediction based on COVID-19

Yuan Gao, Jiangfan Li, Jiani Wang, Zeming Yang
{"title":"U.S. public transportation ridership analysis and prediction based on COVID-19","authors":"Yuan Gao, Jiangfan Li, Jiani Wang, Zeming Yang","doi":"10.1117/12.2672649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a research was conducted to analyse and predict the impacts of COVID-19 on public transportation ridership in the U.S. and 5 most populous cities of the U.S. (New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia). The paper aims to exploit the correlation between COVID-19 and public transportation ridership in the U.S. and make the reasonable prediction by machine learning models, including ARIMA and Prophet, to help the local governments improve the rationality of their policy implementation. After correlation analyses, high level of significant and negative correlations between monthly growth rate of COVID-19 infections and monthly growth rate of public transportation ridership are decidedly validated in the total U.S., and New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, except Houston. To analyse the errors of Houston, we consult the literature and made a discussion of Influencing factors. We find that the level of public transportation in quantity and utilization is terribly low in Houston. In addition, the factors, such as the lack of planning law and estimation of urban expressways, the high level of citizens’ dependence on private cars and pride of owning cars play a considerable roll in the errors. And the impacts can be predicted to a certain extent through two forecasting models (ARIMA and Prophet), although the precision of our models is not enough to make a precise forecast due to the limitations of model tuning and model design. According to the comparison of the two models, ARIMA models' forecasting accuracy is between 6% and 10%, and Prophet's forecasting accuracy is between 8%-12%, depending on the city. Since the insufficient stationarity, periodicity, seasonality of time series, the Prophet models are hard be more refined.","PeriodicalId":290902,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2672649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a research was conducted to analyse and predict the impacts of COVID-19 on public transportation ridership in the U.S. and 5 most populous cities of the U.S. (New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia). The paper aims to exploit the correlation between COVID-19 and public transportation ridership in the U.S. and make the reasonable prediction by machine learning models, including ARIMA and Prophet, to help the local governments improve the rationality of their policy implementation. After correlation analyses, high level of significant and negative correlations between monthly growth rate of COVID-19 infections and monthly growth rate of public transportation ridership are decidedly validated in the total U.S., and New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, except Houston. To analyse the errors of Houston, we consult the literature and made a discussion of Influencing factors. We find that the level of public transportation in quantity and utilization is terribly low in Houston. In addition, the factors, such as the lack of planning law and estimation of urban expressways, the high level of citizens’ dependence on private cars and pride of owning cars play a considerable roll in the errors. And the impacts can be predicted to a certain extent through two forecasting models (ARIMA and Prophet), although the precision of our models is not enough to make a precise forecast due to the limitations of model tuning and model design. According to the comparison of the two models, ARIMA models' forecasting accuracy is between 6% and 10%, and Prophet's forecasting accuracy is between 8%-12%, depending on the city. Since the insufficient stationarity, periodicity, seasonality of time series, the Prophet models are hard be more refined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于COVID-19的美国公共交通客流量分析与预测
本文进行了一项研究,分析和预测了COVID-19对美国和美国5个人口最多的城市(纽约市、洛杉矶、芝加哥、休斯顿、费城)公共交通客流量的影响。本文旨在利用美国的COVID-19与公共交通客流量之间的相关性,通过机器学习模型,包括ARIMA和Prophet,做出合理的预测,帮助地方政府提高政策执行的合理性。相关分析结果显示,除休斯顿外,美国全国和纽约、洛杉矶、芝加哥、费城等地的新冠肺炎感染者月增率与公共交通客流量月增率呈显著负相关。为了分析休斯敦的误差,我们查阅了文献,并对影响因素进行了讨论。我们发现,在休斯敦,公共交通的数量和利用率都非常低。此外,缺乏对城市高速公路的规划规律和估算,市民对私家车的高度依赖以及拥有私家车的自豪感等因素也对误差产生了相当大的影响。通过ARIMA和Prophet两种预测模型可以在一定程度上预测影响,但由于模型调整和模型设计的限制,我们的模型精度不足以做出精确的预测。根据两种模型的比较,ARIMA模型的预测精度在6% - 10%之间,Prophet模型的预测精度在8%-12%之间,具体取决于城市。由于时间序列的平稳性、周期性、季节性不足,先知模型难以进一步完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transmission line UAV inspection multi-link data congestion control method The combined supercritical CO2-based binary mixture Brayton cycle/organic Rankine cycle: a thermodynamic parametric analysis Research on scene text detection algorithm based on modified YOLOv5 Vibration analysis and optimization design of profile sawing and milling machine tool Lung cancer prediction and analysis by regression models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1