Aleksei Petersoni roll vepslaste ja udmurtide rahvuslikus taassünnis (1980.–1990. aastad)

Indrek Jääts, Svetlana Karm
{"title":"Aleksei Petersoni roll vepslaste ja udmurtide rahvuslikus taassünnis (1980.–1990. aastad)","authors":"Indrek Jääts, Svetlana Karm","doi":"10.33302/ermar-2020-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estonian ethnographers have always taken a keen interest in Finno-Ugric peoples, their linguistic kin. The golden age of Finno-Ugric studies in Estonian ethnography began in the 1960s and lasted until the early 1990s. The State Ethnographic Museum of the Estonian SSR in Tartu (the current Estonian National Museum) emerged as the center of Finno-Ugric research with its long-term director Aleksei Peterson at the helm of the enterprise. Estonian ethnographers visited almost all Finno-Ugric peoples, with the major focus given to the Veps in the 1960s and 1970s, and to the Udmurts, in the 1980s. The museum acquired an awe-inspiring number of ethnographic objects, descriptions, photographs, drawings and films. Did all this benefit the peoples visited? What was the relationship of Estonian ethnographers with the subjects of their research? Did their plight affect Estonian scholars?\nThe Estonian ethnographers had a high regard for the ethnic particularities, languages and traditional folk cultures of the kindred peoples and resisted their disappearance. Their views contradicted the Soviet nationalities policy which until the mid-1980s, emphasized the convergence and assimilation of nations. The interaction between the Estonian ethnographers and the Veps and Udmurts during the long series of expeditions helped to stimulate the suppressed and weak ethnic self-esteem of the latter. The mid-1980s marked the beginning of the era of Gorbachev’s glasnost and perestroika. As a result, national issues could be discussed openly, and it was at that time that the national revival of the Veps and Udmurts began. Estonian ethnologists embraced the process and actively contributed to it. This is especially true of Peterson, who was quite well known in Vepsia and Udmurtia and had a certain authority there. In his speeches at various events and in the press, Peterson encouraged the use of Veps and Udmurt in public life, including the schools. He emphasized the need to place a greater emphasis on traditional folk culture, which he considered to be critical to the national identity of small nations. His ideas influenced the creation of the open-air museum of the Udmurts. He supported the territorial autonomy of the Veps. He could speak as a messenger of perestroika whose word had weight. Thus Veps and Udmurt activists and nationally-minded ordinary people received inspiration and moral support from Peterson (and other Estonian ethnographers) for the preservation of their mother tongue, national identity and cultural heritage.","PeriodicalId":307696,"journal":{"name":"Eesti Rahva Muuseumi aastaraamat","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eesti Rahva Muuseumi aastaraamat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33302/ermar-2020-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estonian ethnographers have always taken a keen interest in Finno-Ugric peoples, their linguistic kin. The golden age of Finno-Ugric studies in Estonian ethnography began in the 1960s and lasted until the early 1990s. The State Ethnographic Museum of the Estonian SSR in Tartu (the current Estonian National Museum) emerged as the center of Finno-Ugric research with its long-term director Aleksei Peterson at the helm of the enterprise. Estonian ethnographers visited almost all Finno-Ugric peoples, with the major focus given to the Veps in the 1960s and 1970s, and to the Udmurts, in the 1980s. The museum acquired an awe-inspiring number of ethnographic objects, descriptions, photographs, drawings and films. Did all this benefit the peoples visited? What was the relationship of Estonian ethnographers with the subjects of their research? Did their plight affect Estonian scholars? The Estonian ethnographers had a high regard for the ethnic particularities, languages and traditional folk cultures of the kindred peoples and resisted their disappearance. Their views contradicted the Soviet nationalities policy which until the mid-1980s, emphasized the convergence and assimilation of nations. The interaction between the Estonian ethnographers and the Veps and Udmurts during the long series of expeditions helped to stimulate the suppressed and weak ethnic self-esteem of the latter. The mid-1980s marked the beginning of the era of Gorbachev’s glasnost and perestroika. As a result, national issues could be discussed openly, and it was at that time that the national revival of the Veps and Udmurts began. Estonian ethnologists embraced the process and actively contributed to it. This is especially true of Peterson, who was quite well known in Vepsia and Udmurtia and had a certain authority there. In his speeches at various events and in the press, Peterson encouraged the use of Veps and Udmurt in public life, including the schools. He emphasized the need to place a greater emphasis on traditional folk culture, which he considered to be critical to the national identity of small nations. His ideas influenced the creation of the open-air museum of the Udmurts. He supported the territorial autonomy of the Veps. He could speak as a messenger of perestroika whose word had weight. Thus Veps and Udmurt activists and nationally-minded ordinary people received inspiration and moral support from Peterson (and other Estonian ethnographers) for the preservation of their mother tongue, national identity and cultural heritage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱沙尼亚的民族学家一直对芬兰-乌戈尔民族——他们的语言亲戚——有着浓厚的兴趣。芬兰-乌戈尔研究爱沙尼亚民族志的黄金时代始于20世纪60年代,一直持续到90年代初。塔尔图的爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国国家民族博物馆(现在的爱沙尼亚国家博物馆)成为芬兰-乌戈尔研究的中心,其长期负责人阿列克谢·彼得森(Aleksei Peterson)掌管着这家企业。爱沙尼亚的民族学家访问了几乎所有的芬兰-乌戈尔民族,主要集中在20世纪60年代和70年代的副总统和80年代的乌德穆尔特人。博物馆获得了数量惊人的民族志物品、描述、照片、绘画和电影。这一切对被访问的人有益吗?爱沙尼亚民族学家和他们的研究对象有什么关系?他们的困境影响到爱沙尼亚学者了吗?爱沙尼亚民族志学家高度重视各民族的民族特点、语言和传统民间文化,反对它们的消失。他们的观点与苏联的民族政策相矛盾,直到20世纪80年代中期,苏联的民族政策还强调民族的融合和同化。在漫长的探险过程中,爱沙尼亚民族学家与Veps和Udmurts之间的互动有助于激发后者压抑而脆弱的民族自尊。20世纪80年代中期标志着戈尔巴乔夫开放和改革时代的开始。因此,国家问题可以公开讨论,也是在那个时候,副总统和乌德穆尔特的国家复兴开始了。爱沙尼亚的民族学家接受了这一进程,并积极参与其中。皮特森尤其如此,他在维西亚和乌德穆尔特非常有名,在那里有一定的权威。彼得森在各种活动和媒体上发表演讲,鼓励在公共生活中使用副总统和乌德穆尔特,包括在学校。他强调必须更加重视传统的民间文化,他认为这对小国的民族特性至关重要。他的想法影响了乌德穆尔特露天博物馆的创建。他支持副总统的领土自治。他可以作为改革的使者发言,他的话很有分量。因此,副总统和乌德穆尔特活动人士以及具有民族意识的普通民众得到了彼得森(以及其他爱沙尼亚民族志学家)的鼓舞和道义支持,以保护他们的母语、民族身份和文化遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Muuseumide arendamine: kogudest külastajateni Muuseumikogude potentsiaali kaardistamine päritolu-uuringute kaudu Etnograafiapärandi määratlemisest ja kogumisest Eesti muuseumides Aeg, sotsiaalse aja kiirenemine ja ajalised taktikad Eesti muuseumitöötajate vaates Ärimudelite analüüs Eesti muuseumite näitel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1