Death Assemblages Record Significant Range Contraction in a Molluscan Species of Concern from the Eastern Gulf Of Mexico

S. Sanders, G. Herbert, G. Trobbiani, N. Seiden, Jaime Rogers
{"title":"Death Assemblages Record Significant Range Contraction in a Molluscan Species of Concern from the Eastern Gulf Of Mexico","authors":"S. Sanders, G. Herbert, G. Trobbiani, N. Seiden, Jaime Rogers","doi":"10.58782/flmnh.gxlr7897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marine habitats are in decline due to increasing anthropogenic pressures, but baseline data on species distributions needed to manage and conserve populations are lacking. Incorporating death assemblages into species assessments can create a more accurate understanding of pre-anthropogenic communities than survey records alone. In this study, we conducted a live-dead analysis on mollusks from a new 2008-2018 dredge survey in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. We selected the predatory banded tulip snail, Cinctura hunteria, as a test case for assessment because this species is one of several designated by the Florida Fish and Wildlife as a species of concern. Using spatial count data for shells in our samples, we estimated density values for each taxonomic grade over the sampled area using IDW spatial interpolation. These maps reveal large areas of occupation across the west Florida shelf for two taxonomic grades of dead shells but loss of offshore occurrence for live records. One explanation for the lack of occurrences in offshore habitats is that, unlike dead shell records, there is no time averaging accumulation of live shells. Time averaging increases detectability of species in habitats where they are rare. However, independent fisheries data from live-only animal surveys not only mirror our live-dead results but suggest that habitat loss in our live-dead comparisons was rapid and occurred in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Thus, live-dead comparisons reveal both natural baselines as well as anthropogenic changes in distribution without being significantly distorted by time-averaging biases. Including live-dead data can greatly improve species assessments when long-term survey records are unavailable and provide a key tool in combatting biodiversity loss across marine ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":106523,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58782/flmnh.gxlr7897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine habitats are in decline due to increasing anthropogenic pressures, but baseline data on species distributions needed to manage and conserve populations are lacking. Incorporating death assemblages into species assessments can create a more accurate understanding of pre-anthropogenic communities than survey records alone. In this study, we conducted a live-dead analysis on mollusks from a new 2008-2018 dredge survey in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. We selected the predatory banded tulip snail, Cinctura hunteria, as a test case for assessment because this species is one of several designated by the Florida Fish and Wildlife as a species of concern. Using spatial count data for shells in our samples, we estimated density values for each taxonomic grade over the sampled area using IDW spatial interpolation. These maps reveal large areas of occupation across the west Florida shelf for two taxonomic grades of dead shells but loss of offshore occurrence for live records. One explanation for the lack of occurrences in offshore habitats is that, unlike dead shell records, there is no time averaging accumulation of live shells. Time averaging increases detectability of species in habitats where they are rare. However, independent fisheries data from live-only animal surveys not only mirror our live-dead results but suggest that habitat loss in our live-dead comparisons was rapid and occurred in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Thus, live-dead comparisons reveal both natural baselines as well as anthropogenic changes in distribution without being significantly distorted by time-averaging biases. Including live-dead data can greatly improve species assessments when long-term survey records are unavailable and provide a key tool in combatting biodiversity loss across marine ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡组合记录了墨西哥湾东部一种令人关注的软体动物物种的显著范围收缩
由于人为压力的增加,海洋栖息地正在减少,但缺乏管理和保护种群所需的物种分布基线数据。将死亡组合纳入物种评估可以比单独的调查记录更准确地了解前人类活动群落。在这项研究中,我们对墨西哥湾东部2008-2018年新的疏浚调查中的软体动物进行了活死分析。我们选择了掠食性带状郁金香蜗牛,cintura hunteria,作为评估的测试案例,因为这个物种是佛罗里达鱼类和野生动物协会指定的几个受关注物种之一。利用样本中贝壳的空间计数数据,我们使用IDW空间插值法估计了采样区域上每个分类等级的密度值。这些地图显示了两种分类等级的死壳在西佛罗里达大陆架上的大片占领区域,但在近海出现的活壳却减少了。在近海栖息地很少发生这种情况的一个解释是,与死壳记录不同,没有时间平均活壳的积累。时间平均增加了物种在稀有栖息地的可探测性。然而,来自仅活的动物调查的独立渔业数据不仅反映了我们的活死结果,而且表明在我们的活死比较中,栖息地的丧失是迅速的,发生在20世纪80年代末或90年代初。因此,活死人比较既揭示了自然基线,也揭示了分布的人为变化,而不会受到时间平均偏差的显著扭曲。在没有长期调查记录的情况下,包括活死数据可以大大改善物种评估,并为防止海洋生态系统的生物多样性丧失提供关键工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Body Size Estimation in Toads (Anura: Bufonidae): Applicability to the Fossil Record Human-Driven Diversity Changes in Caribbean Parrots Across the Holocene Coyotes Reveal Baseline Nitrogen Decline Across End-Pleistocene Ecosystem Collapse Integrating Paleo, Historical, Archeological, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Data into Caribbean Coral Reef Management Monitors with Memories: Death Assemblages Record a Century of Wastewater Pollution and Remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1