Expected and Unexpected Consequences of Russian Pension Increase in 2010

I. Suvorov
{"title":"Expected and Unexpected Consequences of Russian Pension Increase in 2010","authors":"I. Suvorov","doi":"10.31477/rjmf.202001.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the effects of the pension increase in Russia in 2010 on the labour force participation decisions and living arrangements of senior people and their family members. There is not much research on the effects of pension rises in Russia. In particular, researchers have not yet analysed the influence of pension increases in Russia on non-elderly people nor the heterogeneity of this influence. The increase in pensions in 2010 is of particular interest due to its unique magnitude, its relative independence from economic trends in Russia at that time, and its plausible exogeneity for pensioners. This study provides evidence that this jump in pension caused an approximately 5 percentage point increase in the relative number of seniors who chose to retire. The effect was stronger in the two biggest cities of Russia, namely Moscow and Saint Petersburg, where before 2010 a substantial number of people continued to work after reaching the pension age. One out of four employed pensioners living in these cities left the labour force in 2010. In addition, this paper shows a relatively unexpected external effect on younger individuals. The labour force participation decisions of younger people who lived with pension receivers were influenced considerably. The non-seniors who lived with pensioners, compared with their peers, were less likely to work or to look for jobs. The change in pensions also affected living arrangements. The rate of pension receivers living with their children and grandchildren went up significantly. Thus, the evidence from the 2010 pension increase highlights the fact that policies might have an impact not only on the target group of population, but on the family members of this group as well.","PeriodicalId":358692,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Money and Finance","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Money and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.202001.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies the effects of the pension increase in Russia in 2010 on the labour force participation decisions and living arrangements of senior people and their family members. There is not much research on the effects of pension rises in Russia. In particular, researchers have not yet analysed the influence of pension increases in Russia on non-elderly people nor the heterogeneity of this influence. The increase in pensions in 2010 is of particular interest due to its unique magnitude, its relative independence from economic trends in Russia at that time, and its plausible exogeneity for pensioners. This study provides evidence that this jump in pension caused an approximately 5 percentage point increase in the relative number of seniors who chose to retire. The effect was stronger in the two biggest cities of Russia, namely Moscow and Saint Petersburg, where before 2010 a substantial number of people continued to work after reaching the pension age. One out of four employed pensioners living in these cities left the labour force in 2010. In addition, this paper shows a relatively unexpected external effect on younger individuals. The labour force participation decisions of younger people who lived with pension receivers were influenced considerably. The non-seniors who lived with pensioners, compared with their peers, were less likely to work or to look for jobs. The change in pensions also affected living arrangements. The rate of pension receivers living with their children and grandchildren went up significantly. Thus, the evidence from the 2010 pension increase highlights the fact that policies might have an impact not only on the target group of population, but on the family members of this group as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010年俄罗斯养老金增长的预期和意外后果
本文研究了2010年俄罗斯养老金增加对老年人及其家庭成员劳动参与决策和生活安排的影响。关于俄罗斯养老金上涨的影响的研究并不多。特别是,研究人员还没有分析俄罗斯养老金增加对非老年人的影响,也没有分析这种影响的异质性。2010年养老金的增长之所以特别引人关注,是因为其规模独特,相对独立于当时俄罗斯的经济趋势,而且养老金领取者似乎具有外源性。这项研究提供的证据表明,养老金的增加导致选择退休的老年人的相对数量增加了大约5个百分点。这种影响在俄罗斯最大的两个城市莫斯科和圣彼得堡更为明显,在2010年之前,这两个城市有相当数量的人在达到退休年龄后继续工作。2010年,四分之一居住在这些城市的退休人员离开了劳动力市场。此外,本文还显示了一种相对意想不到的对年轻人的外部影响。与养恤金领取者一起生活的年轻人的劳动力参与决策受到很大影响。与同龄人相比,与领取养老金的人住在一起的非老年人工作或找工作的可能性较小。养恤金的变化也影响到生活安排。与子女和孙辈同住的养老金领取者比例明显上升。因此,2010年养老金增加的证据突出了这样一个事实,即政策可能不仅对目标人群产生影响,而且对这一群体的家庭成员也有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model with Multiple Trends and Structural Breaks Comparison of Models for Growth-at-Risk Forecasting Modelling the Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy in a Heterogeneous Monetary Union Forecasting Unemployment in Russia Using Machine Learning Methods A Real-Time Historical Database of Macroeconomic Indicators for Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1