Determinants of Trader Profits in Futures Markets

Michaël Dewally, Louis H. Ederington, Chitru S. Fernando
{"title":"Determinants of Trader Profits in Futures Markets","authors":"Michaël Dewally, Louis H. Ederington, Chitru S. Fernando","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1781975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a unique proprietary data set of positions held by all large traders in the crude oil, gasoline, and heating oil futures markets, we use actual trader profits to test the predictions of various commodity futures pricing models. We find statistically and economically significant evidence that: (a) mean hedger profits are negative while speculator profits are positive, which is consistent with the risk premium hypothesis, (b) traders (whether speculators or hedgers) who hold long (short) positions when likely hedgers in aggregate are net short (long) have higher profits than traders whose net positions are aligned with likely hedgers, which is consistent with the hedging pressure hypothesis, and (c) profits on long positions vary inversely with inventories and directly with price volatility, which is consistent with the modern theory of storage. We establish these associations while controlling for macroeconomic risk factors that potentially affect futures returns and for trader characteristics. Our results indicate also that the momentum in commodity futures markets may be due largely to hedging pressure.","PeriodicalId":369344,"journal":{"name":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1781975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using a unique proprietary data set of positions held by all large traders in the crude oil, gasoline, and heating oil futures markets, we use actual trader profits to test the predictions of various commodity futures pricing models. We find statistically and economically significant evidence that: (a) mean hedger profits are negative while speculator profits are positive, which is consistent with the risk premium hypothesis, (b) traders (whether speculators or hedgers) who hold long (short) positions when likely hedgers in aggregate are net short (long) have higher profits than traders whose net positions are aligned with likely hedgers, which is consistent with the hedging pressure hypothesis, and (c) profits on long positions vary inversely with inventories and directly with price volatility, which is consistent with the modern theory of storage. We establish these associations while controlling for macroeconomic risk factors that potentially affect futures returns and for trader characteristics. Our results indicate also that the momentum in commodity futures markets may be due largely to hedging pressure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期货市场中交易者利润的决定因素
使用原油、汽油和取暖油期货市场中所有大型交易商持有的独特专有数据集,我们使用实际交易者利润来测试各种商品期货定价模型的预测。我们发现有统计学和经济学意义的证据表明:(a)平均套期保值者的利润为负,而投机者的利润为正,这与风险溢价假设一致;(b)当可能的套期保值者总体为净空头(多头)时,持有多头(空头)头寸的交易者(无论是投机者还是套期保值者)的利润高于净头寸与可能的套期保值者一致的交易者,这与套期保值压力假设一致;(c)多头仓位利润与库存成反比,与价格波动成正比,这与现代仓储理论一致。我们在控制可能影响期货收益和交易者特征的宏观经济风险因素的同时建立了这些关联。我们的研究结果还表明,商品期货市场的势头可能主要是由于对冲压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Director Connections and Board Advising Investment Risk, CDS Insurance, and Firm Financing An Asset Pricing Approach to Testing General Term Structure Models High Leverage and Willingness to Pay: Evidence from the Residential Housing Market Illiquidity Premia in the Equity Options Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1