Birds inhabiting organic and conventional farms in Central Poland

Karol Wolnicki, G. Lesiński, E. Rembiałkowska
{"title":"Birds inhabiting organic and conventional farms in Central Poland","authors":"Karol Wolnicki, G. Lesiński, E. Rembiałkowska","doi":"10.3409/AZC.52A_1-2.01-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study conducted in Central Poland showed that organic farming is more bene- ficial to birds of the agricultural landscape when compared to conventional farming. The abundance of breeding pairs and species richness were higher on organic farms. Bird communities on organic farms were more diverse and balanced as far as the contribution of habitat specialists and generalists is concerned. The study also indicated that organic farms provided better conditions for representatives of nesting, foraging and habitat groups of birds as opposed to conventional farms. The observed differences were mainly due to the more heterogeneous landscape of organic farms. The number of breeding spe- cies was positively correlated with the relative density of edge zones of ecosystems. The following species: Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana, Great Tit Parus major, Whitethroat Sylvia communis and Starling Sturnus vulgaris were among those which par- ticularly benefited from organic farming.","PeriodicalId":267323,"journal":{"name":"Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia - Series A: Vertebrata","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia - Series A: Vertebrata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3409/AZC.52A_1-2.01-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

A study conducted in Central Poland showed that organic farming is more bene- ficial to birds of the agricultural landscape when compared to conventional farming. The abundance of breeding pairs and species richness were higher on organic farms. Bird communities on organic farms were more diverse and balanced as far as the contribution of habitat specialists and generalists is concerned. The study also indicated that organic farms provided better conditions for representatives of nesting, foraging and habitat groups of birds as opposed to conventional farms. The observed differences were mainly due to the more heterogeneous landscape of organic farms. The number of breeding spe- cies was positively correlated with the relative density of edge zones of ecosystems. The following species: Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana, Great Tit Parus major, Whitethroat Sylvia communis and Starling Sturnus vulgaris were among those which par- ticularly benefited from organic farming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰中部有机农场和传统农场的鸟类
在波兰中部进行的一项研究表明,与传统农业相比,有机农业对农业景观中的鸟类更有益。有机农场的繁殖对丰度和物种丰富度较高。就栖息地专家和通才的贡献而言,有机农场的鸟类群落更加多样化和平衡。该研究还表明,与传统农场相比,有机农场为筑巢、觅食和栖息的鸟类群体提供了更好的条件。观察到的差异主要是由于有机农场的景观异质性较大。繁殖种数与生态系统边缘带的相对密度呈显著正相关。以下物种:圃鹀(Ortolan Bunting)、大山雀(Great Tit Parus major)、白喉鸟(Whitethroat Sylvia communis)和椋鸟(Starling Sturnus vulgaris)都是特别受益于有机农业的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New material of the shrew Macroneomys Fejfar, 1966 (Mammalia, Soricomorpha, Soricidae) from the British early Middle Pleistocene, with comments on its palaeobiology and European range. The wolverine Gulo gulo Linnaeus, 1758 from the Late Pleistocene site at Kaniv: a short review of the history of the species in the Ukraine Effectiveness of mist-netting of bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) during the non-hibernation period in oak forests of Eastern Ukraine Palaeoecology of Late Pliocene and Quaternary mammalian communities in the Carpathian Basin Biœnik Cave and its biostratigraphical position based on equid remains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1