Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP) as a Technique for Treatment of BPH: Evaluation of a Six-Year Experience at a Single Institution

M. Vazirian-Zadeh, Jane Anderson, R. Gill, I. Noaman, Katie Lee, Henryk Krasnowski, Ho Kj
{"title":"Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP) as a Technique for Treatment of BPH: Evaluation of a Six-Year Experience at a Single Institution","authors":"M. Vazirian-Zadeh, Jane Anderson, R. Gill, I. Noaman, Katie Lee, Henryk Krasnowski, Ho Kj","doi":"10.22374/JELEU.V1I2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the undisputed reference standard for elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). However, morbidity after TURP remains significant, with increased risks of bleeding and TUR syndrome. In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in the role of laser technology for the treatment of symptomatic BPE. \nThe aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel technique Thulim laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) developed for the first time in 2009 by Imkamp et al. in treating symptomatic BPE. \nMaterials and methods Analysis of the data from electronic records, case notes, clinic letters all the patients who had undergone ThuLEP using a 70 W thulium laser (Revolix) for symptomatic outflow obstruction over a 6-year period was done. We looked at the pre-procedure PSA, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), Post void residual (PVR) and haemoglobin, comparing it with the postoperative haemoglobin. \nResults 222 patients underwent ThuLEP procedure performed by 2 surgeons. We found a 159 % improvement in Q max, a 61 % improvement in PVR. No mortalities occurred and only 1 patient required post operative blood transfusion. \nThuLEP represents a safe, effective surgical option in patients with symptomatic BPH with relatively little complications, producing significant improvements in both Qmax and PVR. \nKey words \nLUTS, BPE, Enucleation, TUR Syndrome, Qmax","PeriodicalId":136362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/JELEU.V1I2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background and objective Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the undisputed reference standard for elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). However, morbidity after TURP remains significant, with increased risks of bleeding and TUR syndrome. In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in the role of laser technology for the treatment of symptomatic BPE. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel technique Thulim laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) developed for the first time in 2009 by Imkamp et al. in treating symptomatic BPE. Materials and methods Analysis of the data from electronic records, case notes, clinic letters all the patients who had undergone ThuLEP using a 70 W thulium laser (Revolix) for symptomatic outflow obstruction over a 6-year period was done. We looked at the pre-procedure PSA, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), Post void residual (PVR) and haemoglobin, comparing it with the postoperative haemoglobin. Results 222 patients underwent ThuLEP procedure performed by 2 surgeons. We found a 159 % improvement in Q max, a 61 % improvement in PVR. No mortalities occurred and only 1 patient required post operative blood transfusion. ThuLEP represents a safe, effective surgical option in patients with symptomatic BPH with relatively little complications, producing significant improvements in both Qmax and PVR. Key words LUTS, BPE, Enucleation, TUR Syndrome, Qmax
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铥激光前列腺去核术(ThuLEP)作为一种治疗前列腺增生的技术:在单一机构的六年经验评估
背景与目的经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)一直是老年男性良性前列腺肥大(BPE)引起的下尿路症状(LUTS)无可争议的参考标准。然而,TURP后的发病率仍然很高,出血和turr综合征的风险增加。近年来,激光技术在治疗有症状的BPE中的作用逐渐增加。本研究的目的是评估由Imkamp等人于2009年首次开发的新型技术Thulim激光前列腺去核术(ThuLEP)治疗症状性前列腺癌的有效性和安全性。材料与方法对6年来所有使用70w铥激光(Revolix)治疗症状性流出道梗阻的患者的电子记录、病例记录、临床信函等资料进行分析。我们观察了术前PSA、最大尿流率(Qmax)、空腔残留(PVR)和血红蛋白,并将其与术后血红蛋白进行比较。结果222例患者经2位外科医生行ThuLEP手术。我们发现qmax改善了159%,PVR改善了61%。无死亡发生,只有1例患者术后需要输血。对于有症状的前列腺增生患者来说,ThuLEP是一种安全、有效的手术选择,并发症相对较少,Qmax和PVR均有显著改善。关键词LUTS, BPE,眼球摘除,TUR综合征,Qmax
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inverted Y Ureteral Duplication with Distal Obstructing Calculi in the Ectopic Ureter in the Prostatic Urethra Post-operative Events with Post-operative Day One Stent Removal after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Teflon Injections (STING) Mimicking Distal Ureteric Stones Proceedings of the Welsh Urological Society Annual Meeting The Role of the ClearPetra Suction Access Sheath and UROFINO Disposable Ureteroscope as an Alternative to PCNL/Conventional Flexible Ureteroscopy for a Large Renal Pelvis Stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1