Focused ultrasound in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by advanced paramedics

N. Brown, R. Fothergill, I. McIntyre, M. Faulkner, T. Quinn
{"title":"Focused ultrasound in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by advanced paramedics","authors":"N. Brown, R. Fothergill, I. McIntyre, M. Faulkner, T. Quinn","doi":"10.12968/JPAR.2021.13.6.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study describes and evaluates advanced paramedic practitioner (APP) use of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and relates ultrasound findings with decisions to terminate resuscitation. The authors report characteristics of patients who do/do not undergo a FoCUS examination by APPs, ultrasound probe positions used and whether FoCUS findings were associated with decisions to terminate resuscitation or to convey patients to an emergency department (ED) with ongoing resuscitation. A retrospective, observational cohort study of all adult medical OHCA patients attended by APPs in Greater London during 2018 was carried out using data from EMS and APP databases. Twenty-eight APPs attended 1444 OHCA patients in 2018, of whom 744 underwent FoCUS. The subcostal probe position was used most frequently (74%), followed by the parasternal long axis (19%), with significantly smaller use of the parasternal short axis and apical windows. Absence of spontaneous cardiac motion (SCM) was associated with resuscitation being terminated (333 out of 391; 85%) and the presence of SCM was associated with conveyance to the emergency department (213 out of 264 patients; 80%). All decisions to terminate resuscitation were within the APP scope of practice. The authors believe this is the largest prehospital study involving FoCUS in OHCA. An association between FoCUS findings and decisions made to either convey patients to hospital or terminate resuscitation was found. The SC window was most used and ROLE decisions were deemed to be in accordance with local guidance and practice.","PeriodicalId":158722,"journal":{"name":"International Paramedic Practice","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Paramedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/JPAR.2021.13.6.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes and evaluates advanced paramedic practitioner (APP) use of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and relates ultrasound findings with decisions to terminate resuscitation. The authors report characteristics of patients who do/do not undergo a FoCUS examination by APPs, ultrasound probe positions used and whether FoCUS findings were associated with decisions to terminate resuscitation or to convey patients to an emergency department (ED) with ongoing resuscitation. A retrospective, observational cohort study of all adult medical OHCA patients attended by APPs in Greater London during 2018 was carried out using data from EMS and APP databases. Twenty-eight APPs attended 1444 OHCA patients in 2018, of whom 744 underwent FoCUS. The subcostal probe position was used most frequently (74%), followed by the parasternal long axis (19%), with significantly smaller use of the parasternal short axis and apical windows. Absence of spontaneous cardiac motion (SCM) was associated with resuscitation being terminated (333 out of 391; 85%) and the presence of SCM was associated with conveyance to the emergency department (213 out of 264 patients; 80%). All decisions to terminate resuscitation were within the APP scope of practice. The authors believe this is the largest prehospital study involving FoCUS in OHCA. An association between FoCUS findings and decisions made to either convey patients to hospital or terminate resuscitation was found. The SC window was most used and ROLE decisions were deemed to be in accordance with local guidance and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚焦超声在院外心脏骤停中的应用
本研究描述并评估了院外心脏骤停(OHCA)中高级医护人员(APP)使用聚焦心脏超声(FoCUS),并将超声结果与终止复苏的决定联系起来。作者报告了通过app进行/未进行FoCUS检查的患者的特征、使用的超声探头位置以及FoCUS检查结果是否与决定终止复苏或将患者转至正在进行复苏的急诊科(ED)有关。使用EMS和APP数据库的数据,对2018年大伦敦地区APP就诊的所有成年医疗OHCA患者进行了回顾性、观察性队列研究。2018年,28个app参与了1444例OHCA患者,其中744例接受了FoCUS治疗。肋下探头位置使用最频繁(74%),其次是胸骨旁长轴(19%),胸骨旁短轴和根尖窗的使用明显较少。无自发性心脏运动(SCM)与复苏终止相关(391例中有333例;85%),并且SCM的存在与送往急诊室有关(264例患者中有213例;80%)。所有终止复苏的决定均在APP的执业范围内。作者认为这是OHCA中涉及FoCUS的最大的院前研究。FoCUS发现与将患者送往医院或终止复苏的决定之间存在关联。SC窗口被使用得最多,角色决定被认为符合当地的指导和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Out-of-hospital care for postpartum haemorrhage: a scoping review protocol Technology commitment of emergency medical service practitioners and dispatchers Accreditor and employer experiences of emergency care CPD provision On the move Is a fever always a fever? Early assessment of malaria for the remote paramedic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1