Learning Probabilistic Automata for Model Checking

Hua Mao, Yingke Chen, M. Jaeger, Thomas D. Nielsen, K. Larsen, B. Nielsen
{"title":"Learning Probabilistic Automata for Model Checking","authors":"Hua Mao, Yingke Chen, M. Jaeger, Thomas D. Nielsen, K. Larsen, B. Nielsen","doi":"10.1109/QEST.2011.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining accurate system models for verification is a hard and time consuming process, which is seen by industry as a hindrance to adopt otherwise powerful model driven development techniques and tools. In this paper we pursue an alternative approach where an accurate high-level model can be automatically constructed from observations of a given black-box embedded system. We adapt algorithms for learning finite probabilistic automata from observed system behaviors. We prove that in the limit of large sample sizes the learned model will be an accurate representation of the data-generating system. In particular, in the large sample limit, the learned model and the original system will define the same probabilities for linear temporal logic (LTL) properties. Thus, we can perform PLTL model-checking on the learned model to infer properties of the system. We perform experiments learning models from system observations at different levels of abstraction. The experimental results show the learned models provide very good approximations for relevant properties of the original system.","PeriodicalId":252235,"journal":{"name":"2011 Eighth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of SysTems","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Eighth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of SysTems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QEST.2011.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Obtaining accurate system models for verification is a hard and time consuming process, which is seen by industry as a hindrance to adopt otherwise powerful model driven development techniques and tools. In this paper we pursue an alternative approach where an accurate high-level model can be automatically constructed from observations of a given black-box embedded system. We adapt algorithms for learning finite probabilistic automata from observed system behaviors. We prove that in the limit of large sample sizes the learned model will be an accurate representation of the data-generating system. In particular, in the large sample limit, the learned model and the original system will define the same probabilities for linear temporal logic (LTL) properties. Thus, we can perform PLTL model-checking on the learned model to infer properties of the system. We perform experiments learning models from system observations at different levels of abstraction. The experimental results show the learned models provide very good approximations for relevant properties of the original system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于模型检查的学习概率自动机
为验证获得准确的系统模型是一个困难且耗时的过程,这被业界视为采用其他强大的模型驱动开发技术和工具的障碍。在本文中,我们追求一种替代方法,其中可以从给定黑盒嵌入式系统的观察中自动构建精确的高级模型。我们采用算法从观察到的系统行为中学习有限概率自动机。我们证明了在大样本量的限制下,学习模型将是数据生成系统的准确表示。特别是,在大样本限制下,学习模型和原始系统将为线性时间逻辑(LTL)属性定义相同的概率。因此,我们可以对学习的模型进行PLTL模型检查,以推断系统的属性。我们从不同抽象层次的系统观察中进行实验学习模型。实验结果表明,所学习的模型能很好地逼近原系统的相关特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SCOOP: A Tool for SymboliC Optimisations of Probabilistic Processes Compositional Abstractions for Long-Run Properties of Stochastic Systems MARCIE - Model Checking and Reachability Analysis Done EffiCIEntly Quantifying Information Flow Using Min-Entropy Model Checking MDPs with a Unique Compact Invariant Set of Distributions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1