A critical analysis of paradigms and rights in disability dicources

Laura Nyirinkindi
{"title":"A critical analysis of paradigms and rights in disability dicources","authors":"Laura Nyirinkindi","doi":"10.4314/EAJPHR.V12I1.39335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the role of human rights law and advocacy in setting standards for the quality of education services to make the right to basic education a reality for children with disabilities (CWDs) in Uganda. It focuses on the plight of children with disabilities (CWDs) under Uganda's current educational curriculum. These children are doubly marginalized as children and as persons with disabilities (PWDs). The\nauthor analyzes “disability” from different disability models – charitable, medical, human rights and social models. It is argued that the biased categorization in the curriculum of special needs as “difficulties,” “impairment,” “disability,” and “retardation” perpetuates victimization and discrimination of CWDs. Segregation of CWDs from the mainstream schools bars their full inclusion and participation. If PWDs in Uganda are to overcome their deplorable conditions, education must act as the launching pad. The article\nrecognizes the strides made by Uganda to adopt inclusive education policies for special needs education as evident under the Constitution 1995, Children's Statute 1996, and Universal Primary Education (UPE). Nevertheless, the government is advised to ensure coherence and consistency in its conceptualization of inclusive education, lest contradictions in inclusive policies might operate to frustrate the entire strategy. East African Journal of Peace and Human rights Vol. 12 (1) 2006: pp. 49-64","PeriodicalId":296246,"journal":{"name":"East African journal of peace and human rights","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African journal of peace and human rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EAJPHR.V12I1.39335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article analyses the role of human rights law and advocacy in setting standards for the quality of education services to make the right to basic education a reality for children with disabilities (CWDs) in Uganda. It focuses on the plight of children with disabilities (CWDs) under Uganda's current educational curriculum. These children are doubly marginalized as children and as persons with disabilities (PWDs). The author analyzes “disability” from different disability models – charitable, medical, human rights and social models. It is argued that the biased categorization in the curriculum of special needs as “difficulties,” “impairment,” “disability,” and “retardation” perpetuates victimization and discrimination of CWDs. Segregation of CWDs from the mainstream schools bars their full inclusion and participation. If PWDs in Uganda are to overcome their deplorable conditions, education must act as the launching pad. The article recognizes the strides made by Uganda to adopt inclusive education policies for special needs education as evident under the Constitution 1995, Children's Statute 1996, and Universal Primary Education (UPE). Nevertheless, the government is advised to ensure coherence and consistency in its conceptualization of inclusive education, lest contradictions in inclusive policies might operate to frustrate the entire strategy. East African Journal of Peace and Human rights Vol. 12 (1) 2006: pp. 49-64
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对残疾诉讼范式和权利的批判性分析
本文分析了人权法和人权倡导在制定教育服务质量标准以实现乌干达残疾儿童的基础教育权方面的作用。它关注的是乌干达现行教育课程下残疾儿童的困境。这些儿童作为儿童和残疾人受到双重边缘化。作者从不同的残疾模式——慈善模式、医疗模式、人权模式和社会模式——来分析“残疾”。有观点认为,在特殊需要的课程中,有偏见的分类为“困难”、“缺陷”、“残疾”和“发育迟缓”,使对残疾儿童的伤害和歧视持续存在。将残疾儿童与主流学校隔离,使他们无法充分融入和参与。如果乌干达的残疾人要克服他们的悲惨处境,教育必须成为跳板。该条款承认乌干达在1995年《宪法》、1996年《儿童法》和普及初等教育(UPE)中为特殊需要教育采取包容性教育政策所取得的进展。然而,建议政府确保其全纳教育概念的连贯性和一致性,以免包容性政策中的矛盾可能会使整个战略受挫。东非和平与人权杂志,2006年第12卷(1):第49-64页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: pharmacists knowledge, perception and willingness to adopt future implementation in a Zimbabwean urban setting The International Criminal Court and Lubanga: The Feminist Critique and Jus Cogens Access To Information, Gender Participation And Good Governance In Uganda Translating socioeconomic rights from abstract paper rights to fully fledged individual rights: lessons from South Africa Globalization nonsense upon stilts? Reflections on the globalization and human rights nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1