Using a Life Cycle Model to Evaluate Financial Literacy Program Effectiveness

A. Lusardi, P. Michaud, O. Mitchell
{"title":"Using a Life Cycle Model to Evaluate Financial Literacy Program Effectiveness","authors":"A. Lusardi, P. Michaud, O. Mitchell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2707618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior studies disagree regarding the effectiveness of financial literacy programs, especially those offered in the workplace. To explain such measurement differences in evaluation and outcomes, we employ a stochastic life cycle model with endogenous financial knowledge accumulation to investigate how financial education programs optimally shape key economic outcomes. This approach permits us to measure how such programs shape wealth accumulation, financial knowledge, and participation in sophisticated assets (e.g. stocks) across heterogeneous consumers. We then apply conventional program evaluation econometric techniques to simulated data, distinguishing selection and treatment effects. We show that the more effective programs provide follow-up in order to sustain the knowledge acquired by employees via the program; in such an instance, financial education delivered to employeees around the age of 40 can raise savings at retirement by close to 10%. By contrast, one-time education programs do produce short-term but few long-term effects. We also measure how accounting for selection affects estimates of program effectiveness on those who participate. Comparisons of participants and non-participants can be misleading, even using a difference-in-difference strategy. Random program assignment is needed to evaluate program effects on those who participate.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netspar Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2707618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Prior studies disagree regarding the effectiveness of financial literacy programs, especially those offered in the workplace. To explain such measurement differences in evaluation and outcomes, we employ a stochastic life cycle model with endogenous financial knowledge accumulation to investigate how financial education programs optimally shape key economic outcomes. This approach permits us to measure how such programs shape wealth accumulation, financial knowledge, and participation in sophisticated assets (e.g. stocks) across heterogeneous consumers. We then apply conventional program evaluation econometric techniques to simulated data, distinguishing selection and treatment effects. We show that the more effective programs provide follow-up in order to sustain the knowledge acquired by employees via the program; in such an instance, financial education delivered to employeees around the age of 40 can raise savings at retirement by close to 10%. By contrast, one-time education programs do produce short-term but few long-term effects. We also measure how accounting for selection affects estimates of program effectiveness on those who participate. Comparisons of participants and non-participants can be misleading, even using a difference-in-difference strategy. Random program assignment is needed to evaluate program effects on those who participate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用生命周期模型评估金融知识普及计划的有效性
先前的研究并不认同金融知识课程的有效性,尤其是那些在工作场所提供的课程。为了解释这种评估和结果的测量差异,我们采用具有内生金融知识积累的随机生命周期模型来研究金融教育计划如何最优地塑造关键的经济结果。这种方法使我们能够衡量这些程序如何在异质消费者中塑造财富积累、金融知识和复杂资产(例如股票)的参与。然后,我们将传统的项目评估计量经济学技术应用于模拟数据,区分选择和处理效果。我们发现,更有效的项目提供后续跟进,以维持员工通过项目获得的知识;在这种情况下,对40岁左右的员工进行金融教育,可以使退休时的储蓄增加近10%。相比之下,一次性教育项目确实能产生短期效果,但几乎没有长期效果。我们还测量了选择如何影响对参与者的计划有效性的估计。即使使用差异中的差异策略,参与者和非参与者的比较也可能具有误导性。需要随机分配项目来评估项目对参与者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumers’ Decaying Generosity Can Sustain a Profit-Oriented Firm Dependent on Social Preferences The Malthusian Origins of the General Theory: Or How Keynes Came to Write a Book About Say’s Law and Effective Demand Review of Divine Economics Framework Financialization and Hysteresis: The Case of Chile Several Considerations on Commercial Techniques, in the Student's Interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1