Gestational Diabetes: Comparison of Random and Fasting Plasma Glucose as Modalities of Screening

C. Chukwunyere, D. Awonuga, O. Adesina, I. Udenze
{"title":"Gestational Diabetes: Comparison of Random and Fasting Plasma Glucose as Modalities of Screening","authors":"C. Chukwunyere, D. Awonuga, O. Adesina, I. Udenze","doi":"10.33590/emjdiabet/20-00119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Gestational diabetes is glucose intolerance of varying severity with onset in the index pregnancy. This study aimed to compare fasting plasma glucose (FPG) with random plasma glucose (RPG) among pregnant females as methods of screening for gestational diabetes.\n\nMethods: A cross-sectional study of 100 pregnant females selected to have screening for gestational diabetes between gestational ages of 24 and 28 weeks using RPG and FPG. All the subjects had 75 g oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard. Venous plasma glucose assay was performed using glucose oxidase method.\n\nResults: The prevalence of gestational diabetes was 29% using FPG cut-off ≥5.1 mmol/L and 6% using RPG cut-off ≥7.8 mmol/L. The RPG cut-off ≥11.1 mmol/L gave the lowest prevalence rate of 2%, while 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (gold standard test) gave the highest prevalence rate of 30%. RPG cut-off ≥7.8 mmol/L revealed a positive-predictive value of 66.7%, negative-predictive value of 72.3%, and area under the curve of 0.845 compared with FPG level at threshold of 5.1 mmol/L, which gave positive-predictive value of 93.1%, negative-predictive value of 95.8%, and area under the curve 0.920.\n\nConclusion: This study revealed that FPG threshold of 5.1 mmol/L alone performed excellently as a screening test.","PeriodicalId":418035,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Diabetes","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/20-00119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Gestational diabetes is glucose intolerance of varying severity with onset in the index pregnancy. This study aimed to compare fasting plasma glucose (FPG) with random plasma glucose (RPG) among pregnant females as methods of screening for gestational diabetes. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 100 pregnant females selected to have screening for gestational diabetes between gestational ages of 24 and 28 weeks using RPG and FPG. All the subjects had 75 g oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard. Venous plasma glucose assay was performed using glucose oxidase method. Results: The prevalence of gestational diabetes was 29% using FPG cut-off ≥5.1 mmol/L and 6% using RPG cut-off ≥7.8 mmol/L. The RPG cut-off ≥11.1 mmol/L gave the lowest prevalence rate of 2%, while 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (gold standard test) gave the highest prevalence rate of 30%. RPG cut-off ≥7.8 mmol/L revealed a positive-predictive value of 66.7%, negative-predictive value of 72.3%, and area under the curve of 0.845 compared with FPG level at threshold of 5.1 mmol/L, which gave positive-predictive value of 93.1%, negative-predictive value of 95.8%, and area under the curve 0.920. Conclusion: This study revealed that FPG threshold of 5.1 mmol/L alone performed excellently as a screening test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期糖尿病:随机和空腹血糖作为筛查方式的比较
目的:妊娠期糖尿病是一种不同程度的葡萄糖耐受不良,发病于指数妊娠期。本研究旨在比较妊娠女性空腹血糖(FPG)和随机血糖(RPG)作为筛查妊娠糖尿病的方法。方法:对100名孕龄为24 ~ 28周的孕妇进行横断面研究,采用RPG和FPG筛查妊娠糖尿病。所有受试者均以75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验为金标准。采用葡萄糖氧化酶法测定静脉血浆葡萄糖。结果:FPG临界值≥5.1 mmol/L时妊娠期糖尿病患病率为29%,RPG临界值≥7.8 mmol/L时妊娠期糖尿病患病率为6%。RPG临界值≥11.1 mmol/L时患病率最低,为2%,75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验(金标准试验)患病率最高,为30%。pg临界值≥7.8 mmol/L时,阳性预测值为66.7%,阴性预测值为72.3%,曲线下面积为0.845,与阈值为5.1 mmol/L的FPG水平相比,阳性预测值为93.1%,阴性预测值为95.8%,曲线下面积为0.920。结论:本研究表明,FPG阈值单独为5.1 mmol/L是一种很好的筛选试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of the 59th European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Annual Meeting Preconception Care for Individuals with Diabetes EASD 2023 Abstract Highlights Hidden Complication of Obesity and Diabetes: Is It Time to Put More Focus on Fatty Liver? Mean Platelet Volume in Type 2 Diabetes: Correlation with Poor Glycaemic Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1