Process implications of social networking-based requirements negotiation tools

Nupul Kukreja, B. Boehm
{"title":"Process implications of social networking-based requirements negotiation tools","authors":"Nupul Kukreja, B. Boehm","doi":"10.1109/ICSSP.2012.6225983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Avoiding a major source of system and software project failures by finding more non-technical-user friendly methods of system definition and evolution has been a significant challenge. Five generations of the WinWin negotiation framework have improved such capabilities, but even the latest WikiWinWin toolset has encountered problems with non-technical stakeholder usage. With the advent of social networking and popularity of Facebook and Gmail, we have developed a radically different way for collaborative requirements management and negotiations. The new avatar of the WinWin framework called `Winbook' is based on the social networking paradigm, similar to Facebook and content organization using color coded labels, similar to Gmail. Initial usage results on 14 small projects involving non-technical stakeholders have shown profound implications on the way requirements are negotiated and used through the system and software definition and development processes. Winbook has also been adopted as part of a project to bridge requirements and architecting for a major US government organization.","PeriodicalId":166836,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP)","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSP.2012.6225983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Avoiding a major source of system and software project failures by finding more non-technical-user friendly methods of system definition and evolution has been a significant challenge. Five generations of the WinWin negotiation framework have improved such capabilities, but even the latest WikiWinWin toolset has encountered problems with non-technical stakeholder usage. With the advent of social networking and popularity of Facebook and Gmail, we have developed a radically different way for collaborative requirements management and negotiations. The new avatar of the WinWin framework called `Winbook' is based on the social networking paradigm, similar to Facebook and content organization using color coded labels, similar to Gmail. Initial usage results on 14 small projects involving non-technical stakeholders have shown profound implications on the way requirements are negotiated and used through the system and software definition and development processes. Winbook has also been adopted as part of a project to bridge requirements and architecting for a major US government organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于社会网络的需求协商工具的过程含义
通过寻找更多非技术用户友好的系统定义和演化方法来避免系统和软件项目失败的主要来源是一个重大的挑战。五代的WinWin协商框架已经改进了这些功能,但是即使是最新的WikiWinWin工具集也遇到了非技术涉众使用的问题。随着社交网络的出现以及Facebook和Gmail的普及,我们已经开发了一种完全不同的协作需求管理和谈判方式。WinWin框架的新化身名为“Winbook”,它基于社交网络模式,类似于Facebook和使用彩色编码标签的内容组织,类似于Gmail。在涉及非技术涉众的14个小项目上的初始使用结果显示了对通过系统和软件定义及开发过程协商和使用需求的方式的深刻影响。Winbook还被作为一个项目的一部分,用于为一个主要的美国政府组织连接需求和架构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Special panel: Software Process Simulation — At a crossroads? Research and practice reciprocity in software process simulation Modeling kanban processes in systems engineering Risk management in software product lines: An industrial case study System processes are software too
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1