Comparison of Evaluation Methods in the System for Evaluating Competencies

Ondrej Pektor, Bogdan Walek, Ivo Martiník
{"title":"Comparison of Evaluation Methods in the System for Evaluating Competencies","authors":"Ondrej Pektor, Bogdan Walek, Ivo Martiník","doi":"10.1109/ICCC51557.2021.9454663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on comparing evaluation methods in the system for evaluating competencies. The proposed evaluation methods use two main types of expert systems to evaluate job applicants' suitability and competencies. The main characteristics of the proposed methods are described. The article also describes a dataset which contains data and competencies of selected job applicants. The data of job applicants is loaded into the system for evaluating competencies. Next, the proposed evaluation methods are verified and the results are described.","PeriodicalId":339049,"journal":{"name":"2021 22nd International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 22nd International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC51557.2021.9454663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on comparing evaluation methods in the system for evaluating competencies. The proposed evaluation methods use two main types of expert systems to evaluate job applicants' suitability and competencies. The main characteristics of the proposed methods are described. The article also describes a dataset which contains data and competencies of selected job applicants. The data of job applicants is loaded into the system for evaluating competencies. Next, the proposed evaluation methods are verified and the results are described.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能力评价体系中评价方法的比较
本文着重对能力评价体系中的评价方法进行了比较。提出的评估方法使用两种主要类型的专家系统来评估求职者的适合性和能力。介绍了所提方法的主要特点。本文还描述了一个包含选定求职者的数据和能力的数据集。求职者的数据被加载到评估能力的系统中。然后,对所提出的评价方法进行了验证,并对评价结果进行了描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APF-based Control for Obstacle Avoidance in Smart Electric Wheelchair Navigation Human-Machine Interface for Controlling a Light Robotic Arm by Persons with Special Needs Thin Plate Active Vibration Control Parametric Optimization of a Second Order Time Delay System with a PID-Controller Desired Model Method and Disturbance Observer for Integrating Plant with Time Delay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1