Usability Evaluation of a National Mobile-Based Automation System for Pre-Hospital Emergency Care (ASAYAR)

Mina Shayestefar, Mohadese Saffari, F. Kermani, S. Pahlevanynejad, M. Kahouei, M. Mirmohammadkhani, Arash Seidabadi, S. Esmaeili, Mohammad Amin Moradi, Abdolmannan Habibli, A. Firuzi
{"title":"Usability Evaluation of a National Mobile-Based Automation System for Pre-Hospital Emergency Care (ASAYAR)","authors":"Mina Shayestefar, Mohadese Saffari, F. Kermani, S. Pahlevanynejad, M. Kahouei, M. Mirmohammadkhani, Arash Seidabadi, S. Esmaeili, Mohammad Amin Moradi, Abdolmannan Habibli, A. Firuzi","doi":"10.30699/fhi.v12i0.411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is one of the vital links in the care chain, and its services need to be improved. These services can be available through mobile-based automation system, in which low usability level of these systems lead to decrease the acceptance, satisfaction, and confidence of users especially the emergency care team. The purpose of this study was the usability evaluation of a national mobile- based automation system among the pre-hospital emergency care team.Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on pre-hospital emergency care team members in Semnan and Shahroud Universities of Medical Sciences in 2022. The usability evaluation of the mobile- based EMS automation system was done using the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI) questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyze data.Results: One hundred eighty-eight EMS team members from the 31 EMS centers in Semnan province participated in present study. The mean total usability score was 61.93±15.37, the highest mean score was related to the efficiency feature (67.19±19.85) and the lowest mean score was related to the learnability feature (48.21±29.29). There was a reverse and significant relationship between being a manager and the agreement with the usability (p=0.04, OR= -3.383, CI 95%=0.389-29549).Conclusion: This study showed that although an automation system may be widely used in a country, its usability could be at a low level. In order to improve the different function of these systems, it is suggested to participate various clinical experts include prehospital emergency care team in all stages of designing and developing these systems.","PeriodicalId":154611,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Health Informatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v12i0.411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is one of the vital links in the care chain, and its services need to be improved. These services can be available through mobile-based automation system, in which low usability level of these systems lead to decrease the acceptance, satisfaction, and confidence of users especially the emergency care team. The purpose of this study was the usability evaluation of a national mobile- based automation system among the pre-hospital emergency care team.Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on pre-hospital emergency care team members in Semnan and Shahroud Universities of Medical Sciences in 2022. The usability evaluation of the mobile- based EMS automation system was done using the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI) questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyze data.Results: One hundred eighty-eight EMS team members from the 31 EMS centers in Semnan province participated in present study. The mean total usability score was 61.93±15.37, the highest mean score was related to the efficiency feature (67.19±19.85) and the lowest mean score was related to the learnability feature (48.21±29.29). There was a reverse and significant relationship between being a manager and the agreement with the usability (p=0.04, OR= -3.383, CI 95%=0.389-29549).Conclusion: This study showed that although an automation system may be widely used in a country, its usability could be at a low level. In order to improve the different function of these systems, it is suggested to participate various clinical experts include prehospital emergency care team in all stages of designing and developing these systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于移动的全国院前急救自动化系统(ASAYAR)可用性评估
简介:紧急医疗服务(EMS)是医疗链条中至关重要的环节之一,其服务水平有待提高。这些服务可以通过基于移动的自动化系统提供,但这些系统的可用性水平较低,导致用户特别是急救团队的接受度、满意度和信心下降。摘要本研究的目的是评估一套全国性的移动自动化系统在院前急救团队中的可用性。材料与方法:本横断面研究于2022年对Semnan和shahoud医学科学大学的院前急救团队成员进行。采用软件可用性测量量表(SUMI)对移动EMS自动化系统进行了可用性评估。采用多元逻辑回归模型对数据进行分析。结果:来自Semnan省31个EMS中心的188名EMS团队成员参与了本研究。平均总可用性得分为61.93±15.37,最高得分与效率特征相关(67.19±19.85),最低得分与易学性特征相关(48.21±29.29)。作为管理者与对可用性的认同之间存在显著的反向关系(p=0.04, OR= -3.383, CI 95%=0.389-29549)。结论:本研究表明,虽然自动化系统可能在一个国家广泛使用,但其可用性可能处于较低水平。为了改善这些系统的不同功能,建议在设计和开发这些系统的各个阶段都有包括院前急救团队在内的各种临床专家的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Care Application for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Identifying Key Data Elements Effective use of electronic health records system for healthcare delivery in Ghana Predictive Modeling of COVID-19 Hospitalization Using Twenty Machine Learning Classification Algorithms on Cohort Data Development and Usability Evaluation of a Web-Based Health Information Technology Dashboard of Quality and Economic Indicators Potentially Highly Effective Drugs for COVID-19: Virtual Screening and Molecular Docking Study Through PyRx-Vina Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1