{"title":"PENGATURAN PELAKSANAAN DEMONSTRASI PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19","authors":"Andrizal Andrizal, Rachmad Oky Saputra","doi":"10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana pola pengaturan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19, penelitian ini digunakan dalam metode hukum normatif karena untuk melihat pertentangan asas hukum, kekaburan norma hingga adanya kekosongan norma yang terkait dengan pengaturan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi. Pada dasarnya demonstrasi merupakan bagian dari hak asasi manusia yang dijamin dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Kelazimannya demonstrasi identik dengan kerumunan yang menggunakan fasilitas umum namun masukknya masa pandemi Covid-19 membuat kegiatan demonstrasi diatur dengan ketat berdasarkan Permenkes No.9 Tahun 2020. Setelah ditelusuri dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa masih ada bentuk kekaburan norma dan kekosongan norma dalam pengaturan pelaksanaan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19 yang tertuang dalam Permenkes No.9 Tahun 2020 sehingga perlu kiranya merevsi ulang pengaturan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19 \nThis study aims to determine the extent of the pattern of regulating demonstrations during the Covid-19 pandemic, this research is used in the normative legal method because it looks at the conflicting legal principles, the vagueness of norms to the existence of a norm vacuum related to the regulation of demonstrations during the pandemic. Basically demonstrations are part of human rights guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. Usually demonstrations are identical to crowds using public facilities, but the entry of the Covid-19 pandemic has made demonstration activities strictly regulated based on Minister of Health Regulation No. 9 of 2020 but after being traced It can be concluded that there is still a form of norm ambiguity and norm void in the regulation of demonstration implementation during the Covid-19 pandemic as stated in the Minister of Health Regulation No. 9 of 2020 so it is necessary to revise the demonstration arrangement during the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":198081,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana pola pengaturan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19, penelitian ini digunakan dalam metode hukum normatif karena untuk melihat pertentangan asas hukum, kekaburan norma hingga adanya kekosongan norma yang terkait dengan pengaturan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi. Pada dasarnya demonstrasi merupakan bagian dari hak asasi manusia yang dijamin dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Kelazimannya demonstrasi identik dengan kerumunan yang menggunakan fasilitas umum namun masukknya masa pandemi Covid-19 membuat kegiatan demonstrasi diatur dengan ketat berdasarkan Permenkes No.9 Tahun 2020. Setelah ditelusuri dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa masih ada bentuk kekaburan norma dan kekosongan norma dalam pengaturan pelaksanaan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19 yang tertuang dalam Permenkes No.9 Tahun 2020 sehingga perlu kiranya merevsi ulang pengaturan demonstrasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19
This study aims to determine the extent of the pattern of regulating demonstrations during the Covid-19 pandemic, this research is used in the normative legal method because it looks at the conflicting legal principles, the vagueness of norms to the existence of a norm vacuum related to the regulation of demonstrations during the pandemic. Basically demonstrations are part of human rights guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. Usually demonstrations are identical to crowds using public facilities, but the entry of the Covid-19 pandemic has made demonstration activities strictly regulated based on Minister of Health Regulation No. 9 of 2020 but after being traced It can be concluded that there is still a form of norm ambiguity and norm void in the regulation of demonstration implementation during the Covid-19 pandemic as stated in the Minister of Health Regulation No. 9 of 2020 so it is necessary to revise the demonstration arrangement during the Covid-19 pandemic.
本研究的目的是确定Covid-19大流行的示威模式在规范法方法中使用的程度,因为它将不同的规范、规范的复杂性和与大流行示威安排相关的规范真空视为矛盾。示威基本上是1945年宪法保障的人权的一部分。示威活动的发病率与使用公共设施的人群是一样的,但在Covid-19大流行期间,根据2020年9号的警告,组织了抗议活动。可伸缩后追踪结论,还有模糊性规范和真空环境中实施示范规范形式的流行病Covid-19时期写成Permenkes 9号2020年,所以需要重新愿merevsi示威Covid-19这个流行病研究时期设置aims to个重大模式之extent of regulating demonstrations during the Covid-19流行,这项研究使用在普通方法中是合法的,因为它似乎是在合法原则的冲突中,在大流行期间进行常规占卜的真空相关。这基本上是1945年宪法规定的人权的一部分。通常的示威活动被认为是公众使用的,但Covid-19入门》的流行已经让示范活动严格regulated改编自institutes of Health)部长Regulation) 9号》讲traced之后的2020年,但它可以成为结论这就是那里还是a form of the norm norm ambiguity和空隙Regulation)》在示范期间implementation境Covid-19流行美国stated institutes of Health)部长Regulation) 9号2020,所以是必要的修改《Covid-19机构during示范的流行。