The Continuing Adventures of Library Learning Analytics: Exploring the Relationship between Library Skills Training and Student Success

S. Killick, Richard Nurse, H. Clough
{"title":"The Continuing Adventures of Library Learning Analytics: Exploring the Relationship between Library Skills Training and Student Success","authors":"S. Killick, Richard Nurse, H. Clough","doi":"10.29242/lac.2018.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Open University (OU) is the UK’s largest academic institution dedicated to distance learning, with over 173,000 students. Learning analytics is a key organisational strategic driver at the OU where we have been a leader in this research field internationally (Rienties, Toetenel, 2016). Library Services within the University provide students and staff with access to an extensive online collection of library resources; digital and information literacy skills training and 24/7 support. This paper is a continuation of our work in the field of Library Learning Analytics. Previously published research has identified a positive relationship between library collection access and student success (Nurse, Baker and Gambles, 2018), but what about our skills training provision? \n \nLibrary Services have been delivering a suite of online synchronous information literacy training sessions embedded into the curriculum in partnership with faculty colleagues since 2014. Attendance is optional for the students and approximately 20% of qualifications have added the library sessions to their tuition strategies. Following a platform provider change in 2017 data on student attendance at online tutorials, and any subsequent views of sessions after the event, have been collected as part of the institutional learning analytics strategy. This research will investigate the relationship between students who participate in the library-provided training sessions during the academic year 2017-18 and their attainment at the end of the module of study. Attainment data, defined as fail, pass or pass with distinction, will be available in October 2018. Attainment scores of students who chose to attend live, and those who watched the session at a later date, will be compared with students from the same module who did not participate. The research will be conducted in accordance with the institutional Ethical use of Student Data for Learning Analytics Policy (The Open University, 2014). Findings of the research will be completed by November 2018. \n \nAn early pilot study with a single module has found that students who participated in a training session had on average a 6.5% higher score in their next assignment than the students who chose not to attend. The initial pilot also suggests that there may be a difference between students attending live and those viewing the recording. It should be noted however that a number of factors will impact on student success alongside the library training session. \n \nThe drivers for this research are to identify if the online library training sessions are providing an impact on student success in line with key institutional strategic drivers. If they are having a positive effect the information will be used to advocate the service with key stakeholders with an aim to increase resource for the service; with faculty to ensure students from all disciplines are able to benefit; and with students to encourage participation. If they are not having a positive impact on student success future research will be conducted into the reasons why, with the ultimate aim of improving student success. \n \n \nNurse, R., Baker, K. and Gambles, A. (2018) ‘Library resources, student success and the distance-learning university’, Information and Learning Science, 119(1/2), pp. 77–86. doi: 10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0022. \n \nRienties & Toetenel, 2016. The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp.333–341. \n \nThe Open University (2014) Policy on Ethical use of Student Data for Learning Analytics. Milton Keynes. Available at: http://www.open.ac.uk/students/charter/sites/www.open.ac.uk.students.charter/files/files/ethical-use-of-student-data-policy.pdf.","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Open University (OU) is the UK’s largest academic institution dedicated to distance learning, with over 173,000 students. Learning analytics is a key organisational strategic driver at the OU where we have been a leader in this research field internationally (Rienties, Toetenel, 2016). Library Services within the University provide students and staff with access to an extensive online collection of library resources; digital and information literacy skills training and 24/7 support. This paper is a continuation of our work in the field of Library Learning Analytics. Previously published research has identified a positive relationship between library collection access and student success (Nurse, Baker and Gambles, 2018), but what about our skills training provision? Library Services have been delivering a suite of online synchronous information literacy training sessions embedded into the curriculum in partnership with faculty colleagues since 2014. Attendance is optional for the students and approximately 20% of qualifications have added the library sessions to their tuition strategies. Following a platform provider change in 2017 data on student attendance at online tutorials, and any subsequent views of sessions after the event, have been collected as part of the institutional learning analytics strategy. This research will investigate the relationship between students who participate in the library-provided training sessions during the academic year 2017-18 and their attainment at the end of the module of study. Attainment data, defined as fail, pass or pass with distinction, will be available in October 2018. Attainment scores of students who chose to attend live, and those who watched the session at a later date, will be compared with students from the same module who did not participate. The research will be conducted in accordance with the institutional Ethical use of Student Data for Learning Analytics Policy (The Open University, 2014). Findings of the research will be completed by November 2018. An early pilot study with a single module has found that students who participated in a training session had on average a 6.5% higher score in their next assignment than the students who chose not to attend. The initial pilot also suggests that there may be a difference between students attending live and those viewing the recording. It should be noted however that a number of factors will impact on student success alongside the library training session. The drivers for this research are to identify if the online library training sessions are providing an impact on student success in line with key institutional strategic drivers. If they are having a positive effect the information will be used to advocate the service with key stakeholders with an aim to increase resource for the service; with faculty to ensure students from all disciplines are able to benefit; and with students to encourage participation. If they are not having a positive impact on student success future research will be conducted into the reasons why, with the ultimate aim of improving student success. Nurse, R., Baker, K. and Gambles, A. (2018) ‘Library resources, student success and the distance-learning university’, Information and Learning Science, 119(1/2), pp. 77–86. doi: 10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0022. Rienties & Toetenel, 2016. The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp.333–341. The Open University (2014) Policy on Ethical use of Student Data for Learning Analytics. Milton Keynes. Available at: http://www.open.ac.uk/students/charter/sites/www.open.ac.uk.students.charter/files/files/ethical-use-of-student-data-policy.pdf.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆学习分析的持续冒险:探索图书馆技能训练与学生成功的关系
开放大学是英国最大的致力于远程教育的学术机构,拥有超过17.3万名学生。学习分析是开放大学的关键组织战略驱动力,我们在该研究领域一直处于国际领先地位(Rienties, Toetenel, 2016)。大学的图书馆服务为学生和教职员工提供广泛的在线图书馆资源;数字和信息素养技能培训和全天候支持。本文是我们在图书馆学习分析领域工作的延续。之前发表的研究已经确定了图书馆藏书访问与学生成功之间的正相关关系(Nurse, Baker and Gambles, 2018),但我们的技能培训提供呢?自2014年以来,图书馆服务部与教职员工合作,提供了一套嵌入课程的在线同步信息素养培训课程。学生的出勤是可选的,大约20%的学生已经将图书馆课程添加到他们的学费策略中。继2017年平台提供商变更后,在线教程的学生出勤率数据以及活动结束后课程的任何后续视图已被收集为机构学习分析策略的一部分。本研究将调查2017-18学年参加图书馆提供的培训课程的学生与他们在学习模块结束时的成绩之间的关系。成绩数据,定义为不及格、通过或优异通过,将于2018年10月公布。选择参加现场和晚些时候观看的学生的成绩将与同一模块未参加的学生的成绩进行比较。该研究将按照机构道德使用学生数据进行学习分析政策(开放大学,2014年)。研究结果将于2018年11月完成。一项针对单个模块的早期试点研究发现,参加培训课程的学生在下一次作业中的平均得分比没有参加培训课程的学生高6.5%。最初的试点还表明,参加现场直播的学生和观看录音的学生之间可能存在差异。然而,应该注意的是,除了图书馆培训课程外,还有许多因素会影响学生的成功。这项研究的驱动因素是确定在线图书馆培训课程是否对学生的成功产生了影响,这与关键的机构战略驱动因素是一致的。如果他们有积极的影响,这些信息将被用来向主要利益相关者宣传服务,目的是增加服务的资源;与教师一起确保所有学科的学生都能受益;并鼓励学生参与。如果他们没有对学生的成功产生积极的影响,未来的研究将对其原因进行调查,最终目的是提高学生的成功。护士,R., Baker, K.和Gambles, A.(2018)“图书馆资源,学生成功和远程学习大学”,信息与学习科学,119(1/2),第77-86页。doi: 10.1108 / ils - 03 - 2017 - 0022。friends & Toetenel, 2016。学习设计对学生行为、满意度和表现的影响:151个模块的跨机构比较。计算机与人类行为,6,pp.333-341。开放大学(2014)关于道德使用学生数据进行学习分析的政策。弥尔顿凯恩斯。可在:http://www.open.ac.uk/students/charter/sites/www.open.ac.uk.students.charter/files/files/ethical-use-of-student-data-policy.pdf。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Library Design: How Many Seats Do We Need? Engaging Graduate Students in Research and Scholarly Life Cycle Practices: Localized Modeling of Scholarly Communication for Alignment with Strategic Initiatives Reflections on Creating a Multi-Site, Mixed Methods, and Interpretive Assessment Project Choose Your Adventure: A Library Reorganization Case Study Collecting Globally, Connecting Locally: 21st Century Libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1