The effect of genotype, farm and sex on the production traits of fattening pigs of pedigree breed genotypes

M. Gogić, N. Katanić, R. Savić, Violeta Mandić, M. Petričević, V. Zivkovic, N. Stojiljković
{"title":"The effect of genotype, farm and sex on the production traits of fattening pigs of pedigree breed genotypes","authors":"M. Gogić, N. Katanić, R. Savić, Violeta Mandić, M. Petričević, V. Zivkovic, N. Stojiljković","doi":"10.2298/bah2202101g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the production traits of 22 genotypes of fattening pigs was\n carried out on two pig farms (Farm A and Farm B) in Central Serbia, under\n the influence of the following factors: farm, genotype and sex of fattening\n pigs, and pre-slaughter weight. The characteristics of fattening animals\n included in the research are: warm carcass side growth (WCSG); bacon\n thickness - rump (FTR); bacon thickness - back (FTB); bacon thickness - rump\n + back (FTRB); meat yield - carcass sides (JUSKG) and meat yield in\n percentage (JUSPRO), as well as weight and ratio of French dressing in warm\n carcass sides (FDKG and FDPRO). Animals of both sexes were used in the trial\n (female non-castrated rats and surgically castrated males). Total of 1166\n fattening animals were included in the trials. Statistical data processing\n was performed using the Harvey software package. All included factors in the\n used models show a highly statistically significant effect on the variation\n of fattening traits (P<0.01; P<0.001). Animals of genotype DxSL (44.97%) had\n the highest share of meat in carcass sides, and animals of genotype SL\n (44.63%) for the trait JUSPRO, while for the trait FDPRO the highest value\n was recorded for the genotype DXSL (54.45%). In our study, animals of the\n genotypes (HxD)x(WxD) and Dx(WxD) had the highest values for bacon thickness\n - 39.95 and 38.32 mm, respectively, which implies lower share of meat in the\n carcasses. By calculating the genetic and phenotypic correlations, we came\n to the conclusion that the phenotypic correlation of the carcass side traits\n was of different strength (from very weak to complete) and different sign,\n while the genetic correlations were stronger than the phenotypic, so the\n genetic correlations between the bacon thicknesses FTB and FTR were\n complete, and between meat yield and traits FTB and FTR complete and\n negative.","PeriodicalId":249404,"journal":{"name":"Biotehnologija u stocarstvu","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotehnologija u stocarstvu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/bah2202101g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the production traits of 22 genotypes of fattening pigs was carried out on two pig farms (Farm A and Farm B) in Central Serbia, under the influence of the following factors: farm, genotype and sex of fattening pigs, and pre-slaughter weight. The characteristics of fattening animals included in the research are: warm carcass side growth (WCSG); bacon thickness - rump (FTR); bacon thickness - back (FTB); bacon thickness - rump + back (FTRB); meat yield - carcass sides (JUSKG) and meat yield in percentage (JUSPRO), as well as weight and ratio of French dressing in warm carcass sides (FDKG and FDPRO). Animals of both sexes were used in the trial (female non-castrated rats and surgically castrated males). Total of 1166 fattening animals were included in the trials. Statistical data processing was performed using the Harvey software package. All included factors in the used models show a highly statistically significant effect on the variation of fattening traits (P<0.01; P<0.001). Animals of genotype DxSL (44.97%) had the highest share of meat in carcass sides, and animals of genotype SL (44.63%) for the trait JUSPRO, while for the trait FDPRO the highest value was recorded for the genotype DXSL (54.45%). In our study, animals of the genotypes (HxD)x(WxD) and Dx(WxD) had the highest values for bacon thickness - 39.95 and 38.32 mm, respectively, which implies lower share of meat in the carcasses. By calculating the genetic and phenotypic correlations, we came to the conclusion that the phenotypic correlation of the carcass side traits was of different strength (from very weak to complete) and different sign, while the genetic correlations were stronger than the phenotypic, so the genetic correlations between the bacon thicknesses FTB and FTR were complete, and between meat yield and traits FTB and FTR complete and negative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因型、农场和性别对纯种基因型育肥猪生产性状的影响
在塞尔维亚中部的两个养猪场(A场和B场),在养猪场、育肥猪基因型和性别以及宰前体重等因素的影响下,对22种基因型育肥猪的生产性状进行了研究。所研究的育肥动物的特点是:温体侧生长(WCSG);培根厚度-臀肉(FTR);培根厚度-背(FTB);熏肉厚度-臀部+背部(FTRB);胴体侧肉产量(JUSKG)和百分比肉产量(JUSPRO),以及热胴体侧法式调味料重量和比例(FDKG和FDPRO)。试验中使用了两性动物(未阉割的雌性大鼠和手术阉割的雄性大鼠)。试验共纳入1166只育肥动物。统计数据处理采用Harvey软件包。模型中各因子对育肥性状的影响均极显著(P<0.01);P < 0.001)。DxSL基因型的胴体侧肉占比最高,为44.97%;JUSPRO基因型的胴体侧肉占比最高,为44.63%;FDPRO基因型的胴体侧肉占比最高,为54.45%。在我们的研究中,基因型(HxD)x(WxD)和Dx(WxD)的肉厚最高,分别为39.95和38.32 mm,这意味着肉在胴体中的比例较低。通过遗传相关和表型相关的计算,得出胴体侧性状的表型相关强度不同(从极弱到完全)且有不同的标志,而遗传相关强于表型,因此肉质厚度FTB和FTR之间的遗传相关完全,肉质产量与性状FTB和FTR之间的遗传相关完全或负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of fish meal in the nutrition of weaned piglets Contents of sodium-chloride in various groups of locally manufactured meat Estimation of growth traits heritability coefficients in sheep Phenotypic correlation of traits of production and reproduction of Simmental cows in different regions of Serbia Study of fattening and slaughter traits of cattle under the influence of flax seed based nutrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1