Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the European Union

Matteo Gnes
{"title":"Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the European Union","authors":"Matteo Gnes","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses administrative procedure and judicial review in the European Union. The requirement of judicial oversight of administrative action, which results from the common constitutional traditions of the Member States of the EU, is a general principle of EU law, and it is applicable both to proceedings before the Court of justice and before national courts, when EU law is invoked before them. The EU courts carry out a generalized review on any binding acts. Although there are certain differences between acts that may be challenged according to the different remedies provided by EU law, in order to be challengeable, the acts must fulfil several conditions. The most important are: they must be binding and produce legal effects, be definitive and be taken by EU institutions in the exercise of their competencies. Article 263 TFEU provides that the acts of EU institutions may be annulled on grounds of 'lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application, or misuse of powers'. Acts or failure to act may give rise to the liability of EU institutions.","PeriodicalId":147116,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review of Administration in Europe","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review of Administration in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter assesses administrative procedure and judicial review in the European Union. The requirement of judicial oversight of administrative action, which results from the common constitutional traditions of the Member States of the EU, is a general principle of EU law, and it is applicable both to proceedings before the Court of justice and before national courts, when EU law is invoked before them. The EU courts carry out a generalized review on any binding acts. Although there are certain differences between acts that may be challenged according to the different remedies provided by EU law, in order to be challengeable, the acts must fulfil several conditions. The most important are: they must be binding and produce legal effects, be definitive and be taken by EU institutions in the exercise of their competencies. Article 263 TFEU provides that the acts of EU institutions may be annulled on grounds of 'lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application, or misuse of powers'. Acts or failure to act may give rise to the liability of EU institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟的行政程序与司法审查
本章评估了欧盟的行政程序和司法审查。司法监督行政行为的要求源于欧盟成员国共同的宪法传统,是欧盟法的一般原则,当欧盟法在法院和国家法院被援引时,它既适用于法院的诉讼,也适用于国家法院的诉讼。欧盟法院对任何具有约束力的法案进行普遍审查。尽管根据欧盟法律提供的不同补救措施,可能受到质疑的行为之间存在某些差异,但为了受到质疑,这些行为必须满足几个条件。最重要的是:它们必须具有约束力并产生法律效力,必须是明确的,并由欧盟机构在行使其职权时采取。TFEU第263条规定,欧盟机构的行为可以因“缺乏能力、违反基本程序要求、违反条约或与条约适用有关的任何法律规则,或滥用权力”而被撤销。作为或不作为可能会引起欧盟机构的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Belgium Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Ukraine The Common Core of European Administrative Laws and the Pan-European General Principles of Good Administration Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1