A review of assigned protection factors of various types and classes of respiratory protective equipment with reference to their measured breathing resistances.

Abstract

The British Standards Institution 'Guide to implementing an effective respiratory protective device programme' (BS 4275) lists assigned protection factors (APFs) for various types of respiratory protective equipment (RPE). The APFs were allocated either on the basis of available workplace studies data which met set criteria or on the basis of professional judgement that there is equivalence between its operation and that of a device for which an APF is derived from workplace data. However, in many cases no workplace study information exists to support this professional judgement. As an interim measure, pending information based on workplace measurements, the breathing resistance of a range of tight-fitting RPE from negative pressure filtering devices through to self-contained positive pressure breathing apparatus was measured at various breathing rates. The relative inhalation resistances were then compared on the assumption that similar breathing resistance performance is likely to give similar inward leakage on a facepiece and hence similar protection if all other factors, such as fit, etc., are equal. This work indicates that for most devices the allocation of APFs by analogy to other devices seems to be acceptable. However, there appears to be no justification for the allocation of an APF value of 100 to continuous flow compressed air line breathing apparatus. It is recommended that it should be lowered to 40 until there is valid workplace study data to support the current APF of 100. The work provides an informative insight into the relative performance of devices.