‘We don’t want you here’: gender discrimination and women’s responses in American planning, 1970-1990

Brian J. Gauger
{"title":"‘We don’t want you here’: gender discrimination and women’s responses in American planning, 1970-1990","authors":"Brian J. Gauger","doi":"10.3828/tpr.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe first generation of women planners faced a daunting climate in their educations, professional roles and academic posts. They experienced structural disadvantage, discrimination and marginalisation in a male-dominated field. Despite the challenges, women created spaces for solidarity and opportunities for collective action within national planning organisations. This article shows how American women kept both professional and substantive gender concerns in view while striving to make planning more equitable. While they succeeded at instituting structural supports for women and making gender a common topic of planning research, further work remains to empower women of colour and the most marginalised planners.","PeriodicalId":266698,"journal":{"name":"Town Planning Review: Volume ahead-of-print","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Town Planning Review: Volume ahead-of-print","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first generation of women planners faced a daunting climate in their educations, professional roles and academic posts. They experienced structural disadvantage, discrimination and marginalisation in a male-dominated field. Despite the challenges, women created spaces for solidarity and opportunities for collective action within national planning organisations. This article shows how American women kept both professional and substantive gender concerns in view while striving to make planning more equitable. While they succeeded at instituting structural supports for women and making gender a common topic of planning research, further work remains to empower women of colour and the most marginalised planners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们不希望你在这里”:1970-1990年美国计划中的性别歧视和妇女的反应
第一代女性规划人员在教育、专业角色和学术职位方面面临着令人生畏的气氛。她们在男性主导的领域经历了结构性劣势、歧视和边缘化。尽管面临挑战,妇女在国家规划组织内创造了团结的空间和集体行动的机会。这篇文章展示了美国妇女在努力使计划更加公平的同时,如何兼顾专业和实质性的性别问题。虽然他们成功地建立了对妇女的结构性支持,并使性别成为规划研究的一个共同主题,但进一步的工作仍是赋予有色人种妇女和最边缘化的规划者权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the design of integral urban regeneration plans: combining policy evaluability and plan quality approaches to analyse complex urban policies Can the marooned flagship of local democracy in English planning be refloated? The case of neighbourhood planning Climate resilience and environmental justice: state of research and implementation in planning practice in Germany and beyond Land valuation and land policy: implications of normative bias From Calatrava to the ‘Concha Piquer’ effect: policy change, unintended impacts of the ‘creative city’, and factors leading to cultural management inertia in València
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1