Applying a Needs Assessment Model for Improving Agricultural Education in Guinea

R. Hanagriff, M. Wallace, J. Elliot
{"title":"Applying a Needs Assessment Model for Improving Agricultural Education in Guinea","authors":"R. Hanagriff, M. Wallace, J. Elliot","doi":"10.5191//jiaee.2020.27479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extension education is considered an essential component of improving agricultural sustainability by diffusing innovations that increase crop yield and alleviate poverty in Guinea, Africa. To accomplish learning outcomes, extension agents must be confident and competent in their instructional abilities. This is achieved by self-evaluation of their training needs. The objective of this quantitative research was to conduct a needs assessment with leaders of the Farmer-to-Farmer educational program to identify their training needs. A purposive sample of thirteen higher-education leaders of the Farmer-to-Farmer program were asked to identify their educational needs and prioritize items contributing to the knowledge gap following their participation in a ten-day training. The Borich Needs Assessment Model was used to calculate the mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS) of all items. The top five content areas with the greatest reported needs were: Power Point presentations (MWDS = 5.72), teaching financial management (MWDS = 5.51), using SWOT analysis (MWDS = 4.5), teaching marketing concepts (MWDS = 4.36) and incorporating stakeholders (MWDS = 4.35). Following a Pre/Post-Test, the top five content knowledge improvement areas and percent increase in reported knowledge were utilizing strategic planning (176%), using Borich (1970) for program needs assessment (153%), using SWOT analysis (122%), analyzing external influences in educational programs (115%) and strategies to conduct farm trials (67%). Respondents reported increased confidence in seeking stakeholder needs and building resources to increase program value. The results have implications to build education equity and sustainability in Guinea. \n\nKeywords: Borich needs assessment, agricultural extension education, Guinea agriculture, program planning, strategic planning, Farmer-to-Farmer","PeriodicalId":133020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5191//jiaee.2020.27479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extension education is considered an essential component of improving agricultural sustainability by diffusing innovations that increase crop yield and alleviate poverty in Guinea, Africa. To accomplish learning outcomes, extension agents must be confident and competent in their instructional abilities. This is achieved by self-evaluation of their training needs. The objective of this quantitative research was to conduct a needs assessment with leaders of the Farmer-to-Farmer educational program to identify their training needs. A purposive sample of thirteen higher-education leaders of the Farmer-to-Farmer program were asked to identify their educational needs and prioritize items contributing to the knowledge gap following their participation in a ten-day training. The Borich Needs Assessment Model was used to calculate the mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS) of all items. The top five content areas with the greatest reported needs were: Power Point presentations (MWDS = 5.72), teaching financial management (MWDS = 5.51), using SWOT analysis (MWDS = 4.5), teaching marketing concepts (MWDS = 4.36) and incorporating stakeholders (MWDS = 4.35). Following a Pre/Post-Test, the top five content knowledge improvement areas and percent increase in reported knowledge were utilizing strategic planning (176%), using Borich (1970) for program needs assessment (153%), using SWOT analysis (122%), analyzing external influences in educational programs (115%) and strategies to conduct farm trials (67%). Respondents reported increased confidence in seeking stakeholder needs and building resources to increase program value. The results have implications to build education equity and sustainability in Guinea. Keywords: Borich needs assessment, agricultural extension education, Guinea agriculture, program planning, strategic planning, Farmer-to-Farmer
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用需求评估模型改善几内亚农业教育
在非洲几内亚,推广教育被认为是通过传播提高作物产量和减轻贫困的创新来提高农业可持续性的重要组成部分。为了完成学习成果,扩展代理必须对自己的教学能力充满信心和能力。这是通过对培训需求的自我评估来实现的。这项定量研究的目的是对农民对农民教育项目的领导者进行需求评估,以确定他们的培训需求。有目的的13名农民对农民项目的高等教育领导者被要求确定他们的教育需求,并在他们参加为期十天的培训后优先考虑导致知识差距的项目。采用Borich需求评估模型计算各项目的平均加权差异评分(MWDS)。报告中需求最大的五个内容领域分别是:ppt演示(MWDS = 5.72)、财务管理教学(MWDS = 5.51)、使用SWOT分析(MWDS = 4.5)、营销概念教学(MWDS = 4.36)和纳入利益相关者(MWDS = 4.35)。在前后测试之后,排名前五的内容知识改进领域和报告知识的百分比增加是利用战略规划(176%),使用Borich(1970)进行项目需求评估(153%),使用SWOT分析(122%),分析教育项目中的外部影响(115%)和进行农场试验的策略(67%)。受访者报告说,在寻求涉众需求和建立资源以增加项目价值方面增加了信心。研究结果对在几内亚建立教育公平和可持续性具有重要意义。关键词:Borich需求评估,农业推广教育,几内亚农业,项目规划,战略规划,农民对农民
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examination of Ugandan Educators’ Cultural Preferences when Teaching Agriculture: A Q Methodological Study Perceptions of Professionals, Faculty, and Students Regarding the Implementation of an Agricultural Communications Degree Program in the United Kingdom Fighting Alone: The Lived Experiences of African Women Immigrant Farmers Acquiring Land in the U.S. 4-H Senegal Community of Practice Developing STEM Curricula that Leads to Youth-driven Discovery and Innovation Students’ Acquisition of Agricultural and Entrepreneurship (Agripreneurship) Knowledge and Skills: Does Instructional Approach and their Sex Matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1