Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation

Dian Pertiwi, Taufik Samsuri, Agus Muliadi
{"title":"Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation","authors":"Dian Pertiwi, Taufik Samsuri, Agus Muliadi","doi":"10.36312/e-saintika.v2i2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Title: Improving Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes using Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation]. The purpose of this study was to improve student cognitive learning outcomes using the Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation in class X MIA 2 students of SMAS NW Mataram in the 2018/2019 academic year. The subjects of this study were 15 students of class X MIA 2. This research is a classroom action research (CAR) consisting of two cycles. Observation sheet of learning implementation is used for each meeting to find out the implementation of learning steps according to the learning implementation plan observed by 2 observers. Test instruments of 20 multiple choice questions and 5 description questions were used in this study to find out the improvement of students' cognitive learning outcomes in each cycle. The results showed the implementation of learning in the cycle I (1) the first meeting reached 63.63% with a good category and the second meeting reached 88.8% with a very good category, (2) the cognitive learning outcomes of students in cycle 1 obtained an average value 59 with the classical completeness value achieved 46% of the incomplete category, while in cycle II (3) the first meeting of the implementation of learning reached 72.72% with a good category (4) the second meeting reached 94.44% with a very good category, and for results cognitive learning students obtained an average value of 72 with a classical completeness value achieved 76%. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation can improve cognitive learning outcomes of class X MIA 2 students of SMAS NW Mataram in the 2018/2019 academic year.","PeriodicalId":165148,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i2.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

[Title: Improving Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes using Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation]. The purpose of this study was to improve student cognitive learning outcomes using the Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation in class X MIA 2 students of SMAS NW Mataram in the 2018/2019 academic year. The subjects of this study were 15 students of class X MIA 2. This research is a classroom action research (CAR) consisting of two cycles. Observation sheet of learning implementation is used for each meeting to find out the implementation of learning steps according to the learning implementation plan observed by 2 observers. Test instruments of 20 multiple choice questions and 5 description questions were used in this study to find out the improvement of students' cognitive learning outcomes in each cycle. The results showed the implementation of learning in the cycle I (1) the first meeting reached 63.63% with a good category and the second meeting reached 88.8% with a very good category, (2) the cognitive learning outcomes of students in cycle 1 obtained an average value 59 with the classical completeness value achieved 46% of the incomplete category, while in cycle II (3) the first meeting of the implementation of learning reached 72.72% with a good category (4) the second meeting reached 94.44% with a very good category, and for results cognitive learning students obtained an average value of 72 with a classical completeness value achieved 76%. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation can improve cognitive learning outcomes of class X MIA 2 students of SMAS NW Mataram in the 2018/2019 academic year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用群体调查类型的合作学习模式提高学生的认知学习结果
[题目:利用合作学习模式型小组调查提高学生认知学习成果]。本研究的目的是采用合作学习模式的小组调查方法,在2018/2019学年对西北马塔兰中学X班MIA 2学生进行认知学习效果的改善。本研究以MIA 2班15名学生为研究对象。本研究是由两个周期组成的课堂行动研究(CAR)。每次会议使用学习实施观察表,根据2名观察员观察到的学习实施计划,找出学习步骤的实施情况。本研究采用20个选择题和5个描述题的测试工具,以了解学生在每个周期的认知学习成果的改善情况。结果表明:第一周期学生的学习执行情况(1)第一次会议达到63.63%,类别为好,第二次会议达到88.8%,类别为很好;(2)第一周期学生的认知学习成果平均为59,经典完备值达到不完备类别的46%;而在周期II(3)中,第一次会议的学习执行率达到72.72%,类别为好(4),第二次会议的学习执行率达到94.44%,类别为很好,结果认知学习学生的平均得分为72,经典完整性值达到76%。本研究结果表明,合作学习模式式小组调查能提高2018/2019学年西北马塔兰中学X班MIA 2学生的认知学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Future Classroom: Analyzing the Integration and Impact of Digital Technologies in Science Education Characteristics of Project-Based Learning Models on the Project to Strengthening the Pancasila Student Profiles at Muhammadiyah School The Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Mobile Learning on Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Did the Mediation of Self-Competence Matter? Bioindicators for Forest Area Condition: A Systematic Literature Review Learning Outcomes of the Inquiry-in-Action Model for Chemistry Experimentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1