{"title":"Pengaruh Strategi Metakognitif Dan Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa","authors":"E. Juniawan","doi":"10.23969/pjme.v10i1.2423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate whether there are differences in mathematical\nreasoning abilities of students who follow the metacogynitive strategy of\nproblem solving with students who participate in repeating metacognitive\nlearning, see whether there is an interaction between metacognitive strategies\nand students' initial ability to influence mathematical reasoning abilities and\nknow whether there are differences in mathematical reasoning ability between\nstudents who have high and low initial abilities. This research is a Quasi\nExperimental study with posttest-only design in two Madrasah Tsanawiyah\nschools in Tangerang District with the same initial ability. The number of\nsamples taken by cluster random sampling is class VII MTs. Daar El Qolam 1 and\nVII MTs. Daar El Qolam 4 as many as 128 students. The results of the study: 1)\nthere are differences in mathematical reasoning ability between students who\ntake learning problem-solving metacognitive strategies and students who take\nmetacognitive learning to repeat, 2) there is an interaction between metacognitive\nstrategies and students 'initial ability to influence students' mathematical\nreasoning abilities, (3) For students the initial ability is high, the reasoning\nabilities that learn to use problem solving strategies are lower than those that\nlearn by using a repeating strategy (4) For students who have low initial abilities,\nthe reasoning abilities that learn to use problem solving strategies are lower than\nthose who learn by using a repeating strategy.","PeriodicalId":237144,"journal":{"name":"Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23969/pjme.v10i1.2423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether there are differences in mathematical
reasoning abilities of students who follow the metacogynitive strategy of
problem solving with students who participate in repeating metacognitive
learning, see whether there is an interaction between metacognitive strategies
and students' initial ability to influence mathematical reasoning abilities and
know whether there are differences in mathematical reasoning ability between
students who have high and low initial abilities. This research is a Quasi
Experimental study with posttest-only design in two Madrasah Tsanawiyah
schools in Tangerang District with the same initial ability. The number of
samples taken by cluster random sampling is class VII MTs. Daar El Qolam 1 and
VII MTs. Daar El Qolam 4 as many as 128 students. The results of the study: 1)
there are differences in mathematical reasoning ability between students who
take learning problem-solving metacognitive strategies and students who take
metacognitive learning to repeat, 2) there is an interaction between metacognitive
strategies and students 'initial ability to influence students' mathematical
reasoning abilities, (3) For students the initial ability is high, the reasoning
abilities that learn to use problem solving strategies are lower than those that
learn by using a repeating strategy (4) For students who have low initial abilities,
the reasoning abilities that learn to use problem solving strategies are lower than
those who learn by using a repeating strategy.
本研究旨在探讨采用元认知解决问题策略的学生与采用重复元认知学习策略的学生在数学推理能力上是否存在差异。观察元认知策略与学生的初始能力之间是否存在相互作用影响数学推理能力,了解初始能力高低的学生在数学推理能力上是否存在差异。本研究是一项准实验研究,采用后验设计,在坦格朗区两所初始能力相同的马德拉萨察纳维耶学校进行。整群随机抽样抽取的样本数量为Daar El Qolam 1班和Daar El Qolam 4班共计128名学生。研究结果如下:(1)采用解决问题元认知策略学习的学生与采用重复元认知学习的学生在数学推理能力上存在差异;(2)元认知策略与学生的初始能力存在交互作用,影响学生的数学推理能力;(3)学生的初始能力较高;(4)对于初始能力较低的学生,学习使用问题解决策略的推理能力低于使用重复策略学习的学生。