{"title":"Understanding and motivation for reading in eighteenth-century Finland","authors":"Tuija Laine","doi":"10.19195/0080-3626.65.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading skills were part of Christian education in early modern Finland. According to the church law (1686), it was a task of parents to teach their children to read. If they were unable to do it, for example because they were illiterate themselves, they could receive help from their parish. It was important for a Christian to acquaint him/herself with the basics of Christianity by reading the Catechism. \nThe ability to read was not sufficient. People were also supposed to understand the text they read. If they did not understand it, they were not motivated to read. Among the understanding strategies memorising was used most frequently. It was based on repetitive reading, which was a common reading strategy in early modern Finland – not least because the amount of books in vernacular was still small. The same texts were read again and again. The strategy is also called intensive reading. Better readers even used observation strategies. They estimated their knowledge and understanding during the reading process. \nAccording to Deci and Ryan (Motivation, Personality and Development within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory, 2012), there are three fundamental psychological needs, which bring not only well-being but also motivation to people. They are competence, autonomy and relationship. In early modern Finland these needs were satisfied in various ways. In general, those who were more familiar with religious speech and reading, as a result of their family background or because of their friends, learnt quickly, made better progress and proved their competence and autonomy in reading. Others, who had less support from their family or community, had poorer religious vocabulary, more difficulties to understand what they read and less motivation to read. They were afraid of the examinations in the Catechism and of the social pressure in such circumstances. They also felt inadequacy in reading.","PeriodicalId":250542,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Biblioteczne","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Biblioteczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/0080-3626.65.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reading skills were part of Christian education in early modern Finland. According to the church law (1686), it was a task of parents to teach their children to read. If they were unable to do it, for example because they were illiterate themselves, they could receive help from their parish. It was important for a Christian to acquaint him/herself with the basics of Christianity by reading the Catechism.
The ability to read was not sufficient. People were also supposed to understand the text they read. If they did not understand it, they were not motivated to read. Among the understanding strategies memorising was used most frequently. It was based on repetitive reading, which was a common reading strategy in early modern Finland – not least because the amount of books in vernacular was still small. The same texts were read again and again. The strategy is also called intensive reading. Better readers even used observation strategies. They estimated their knowledge and understanding during the reading process.
According to Deci and Ryan (Motivation, Personality and Development within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory, 2012), there are three fundamental psychological needs, which bring not only well-being but also motivation to people. They are competence, autonomy and relationship. In early modern Finland these needs were satisfied in various ways. In general, those who were more familiar with religious speech and reading, as a result of their family background or because of their friends, learnt quickly, made better progress and proved their competence and autonomy in reading. Others, who had less support from their family or community, had poorer religious vocabulary, more difficulties to understand what they read and less motivation to read. They were afraid of the examinations in the Catechism and of the social pressure in such circumstances. They also felt inadequacy in reading.
阅读技巧是现代芬兰早期基督教教育的一部分。根据教会法(1686年),教会孩子阅读是父母的任务。如果他们无法做到这一点,比如因为他们自己是文盲,他们可以从教区获得帮助。对于一个基督徒来说,通过阅读教义问答来熟悉基督教的基本知识是很重要的。阅读能力是不够的。人们也应该理解他们所读的文章。如果他们不理解,他们就没有动力去阅读。在所有的理解策略中,记忆是最常用的。它基于重复阅读,这是现代芬兰早期的一种常见的阅读策略——尤其是因为白话书的数量仍然很少。同样的文章被一遍又一遍地读。这种策略也被称为精读。更好的阅读者甚至使用观察策略。他们在阅读过程中评估了自己的知识和理解力。根据Deci和Ryan (Motivation, Personality and Development within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory, 2012)的观点,有三种基本的心理需求,它们不仅给人们带来了幸福感,也给人们带来了动力。它们是能力、自主和关系。在近代早期的芬兰,这些需求通过各种方式得到了满足。总的来说,那些由于家庭背景或朋友的影响而更熟悉宗教演讲和阅读的人,学习得更快,进步更好,证明了他们在阅读方面的能力和自主性。而那些从家庭或社区得到的支持较少的人,他们的宗教词汇较少,理解所读内容的难度更大,阅读的动力也更小。他们害怕教理问答的考试,害怕在这种情况下的社会压力。他们也感到阅读能力不足。