Mantle treatment. Absorbed dose measurements in patients compared with dose planning.

G Svahn-Tapper
{"title":"Mantle treatment. Absorbed dose measurements in patients compared with dose planning.","authors":"G Svahn-Tapper","doi":"10.3109/02841867609131972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo dose measurements were performed in the hypopharnyx-oesophagus for 60 adult patients receiving mantle treatment with 60Co. The measurements of absorbed dose in more than 1 600 points were analysed and compared with dose plans for the same patients. For the technique used the mean difference between in vivo measured and planned absorbed dose is within +0.4 and -1.3 per cent with a standard error of the mean of 0.4 per cent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7139,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica: therapy, physics, biology","volume":"15 4","pages":"340-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/02841867609131972","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica: therapy, physics, biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/02841867609131972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In vivo dose measurements were performed in the hypopharnyx-oesophagus for 60 adult patients receiving mantle treatment with 60Co. The measurements of absorbed dose in more than 1 600 points were analysed and compared with dose plans for the same patients. For the technique used the mean difference between in vivo measured and planned absorbed dose is within +0.4 and -1.3 per cent with a standard error of the mean of 0.4 per cent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地幔治疗。患者吸收剂量测量与剂量计划的比较。
对60例接受60Co地幔治疗的成人患者进行了下咽-食管的体内剂量测量。对1 600多个点的吸收剂量测量结果进行了分析,并与同一患者的剂量计划进行了比较。对于所使用的技术,体内测量剂量和计划吸收剂量之间的平均差异在+ 0.4%和- 1.3%之间,平均标准误差为0.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of high energy protons on brain and glioma of mice. Radiation therapy of intracranial tumors--long term results. Histiocytosis X. I. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate correlated to prognosis and extent of disease. Influence of air cavities on central depth dose curves for 33 MV roentgen rays. 99Tcm-DP accumulation in rabbit skull bones after 60Co gamma irradiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1