Spirometry to motivate smoking cessation - a systematic review

E. Westerdahl, M. Arne, M. Larsson, Kjell Ola Engman
{"title":"Spirometry to motivate smoking cessation - a systematic review","authors":"E. Westerdahl, M. Arne, M. Larsson, Kjell Ola Engman","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performing spirometry on patients who smoke, yet are asymptomatic, to show adverse effects has been suggested to be useful for motivation to quit smoking. However, the effect of such intervention is unclear. The purpose of this review is to determine whether or not feedback of spirometry results to adult smokers in connection with counselling to stop smoking can increase the rates of smoking cessation compared to smoking cessation advice alone. In this systematic review, we included RCTs evaluating smoking cessation interventions for smokers. A systematic search was performed in seven databases. This resulted in 946 studies, which, after reading by two independent reviewers, were reduced to seven trials that matched the inclusion criteria. Two RCTs showed significant improvement in smoking cessation when giving patients feedback on spirometric results in combination with smoking cessation counselling, as compared to patients who only received smoking cessation counselling. In both studies, the spirometry results were expressed as so-called lung age. In the other five studies no difference was found. Five further study protocols for ongoing RCTs have been found, which can be expected to necessitate the updating of this systematic overview within a few years. In summary, there is today limited support in the literature that feedback from spirometry including demonstration of lung age, in addition to smoking cessation counselling, is favorable for motivating patients to stop smoking. Regarding long-term effects, scientific support is today insufficient.","PeriodicalId":212819,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Performing spirometry on patients who smoke, yet are asymptomatic, to show adverse effects has been suggested to be useful for motivation to quit smoking. However, the effect of such intervention is unclear. The purpose of this review is to determine whether or not feedback of spirometry results to adult smokers in connection with counselling to stop smoking can increase the rates of smoking cessation compared to smoking cessation advice alone. In this systematic review, we included RCTs evaluating smoking cessation interventions for smokers. A systematic search was performed in seven databases. This resulted in 946 studies, which, after reading by two independent reviewers, were reduced to seven trials that matched the inclusion criteria. Two RCTs showed significant improvement in smoking cessation when giving patients feedback on spirometric results in combination with smoking cessation counselling, as compared to patients who only received smoking cessation counselling. In both studies, the spirometry results were expressed as so-called lung age. In the other five studies no difference was found. Five further study protocols for ongoing RCTs have been found, which can be expected to necessitate the updating of this systematic overview within a few years. In summary, there is today limited support in the literature that feedback from spirometry including demonstration of lung age, in addition to smoking cessation counselling, is favorable for motivating patients to stop smoking. Regarding long-term effects, scientific support is today insufficient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺活量测定法促进戒烟——一项系统综述
对无症状吸烟的患者进行肺活量测定,以显示不良反应,已被认为对戒烟动机有用。然而,这种干预的效果尚不清楚。本综述的目的是确定与单独的戒烟建议相比,肺活量测定结果与戒烟咨询的反馈是否能提高成年吸烟者的戒烟率。在本系统综述中,我们纳入了评估吸烟者戒烟干预措施的随机对照试验。在七个数据库中进行了系统搜索。这导致了946项研究,经过两位独立审稿人的阅读,这些研究减少到7项符合纳入标准的试验。两项随机对照试验显示,与仅接受戒烟咨询的患者相比,给予患者肺量测量结果反馈并结合戒烟咨询时,戒烟效果有显著改善。在这两项研究中,肺活量测定结果被表示为所谓的肺年龄。在其他五项研究中没有发现差异。目前已经发现了五个正在进行的随机对照试验的进一步研究方案,预计需要在几年内更新这一系统概述。综上所述,目前文献中支持肺活量测定的反馈,包括肺年龄的显示,以及戒烟咨询,有利于激励患者戒烟。关于长期影响,目前的科学支持还不够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 and smoking: Worse outcome from a surveillance analysis 5 years’ experience of the Quitline in Hungary-where do we go next? Most users quit e-cigarettes without succeeding to quit smoking Smoking cessation activity in respiratory outpatient clinics Impact of Cardiovascular Disease on dyspnea and lung function in a population of Tunisian smokers without airflow limitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1