A typology and meta-analysis of outsourcing relationship frameworks

Paul Lyons, L. Brennan
{"title":"A typology and meta-analysis of outsourcing relationship frameworks","authors":"Paul Lyons, L. Brennan","doi":"10.1108/SO-04-2014-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to consider 52 conceptual frameworks identified during a systematic literature review with the aim of providing insights into various aspects of outsourcing relationships. Many authors propose these frameworks to contribute to our understanding of how outsourcing relationships are conceived, operate and evolve. A meta-analysis of these frameworks was completed. Design/methodology/approach – The approach consisted of five stages: a systematic, but focused literature review to identify relevant frameworks; a study of the selected frameworks to enable the design of a typology of framework styles, so that frameworks adopting similar styles can be compared and analysed; grouping of the frameworks into families addressing different aspects of relationships as they form, operate and evolve; using the types (from the typology) within these family groups to facilitate a meta-analysis of each group by identifying common or contrasting themes; and deriving overall observations...","PeriodicalId":319712,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-04-2014-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to consider 52 conceptual frameworks identified during a systematic literature review with the aim of providing insights into various aspects of outsourcing relationships. Many authors propose these frameworks to contribute to our understanding of how outsourcing relationships are conceived, operate and evolve. A meta-analysis of these frameworks was completed. Design/methodology/approach – The approach consisted of five stages: a systematic, but focused literature review to identify relevant frameworks; a study of the selected frameworks to enable the design of a typology of framework styles, so that frameworks adopting similar styles can be compared and analysed; grouping of the frameworks into families addressing different aspects of relationships as they form, operate and evolve; using the types (from the typology) within these family groups to facilitate a meta-analysis of each group by identifying common or contrasting themes; and deriving overall observations...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外包关系框架的类型学和元分析
目的-本文的目的是考虑在系统文献综述中确定的52个概念框架,目的是提供对外包关系各个方面的见解。许多作者提出了这些框架,以帮助我们理解外包关系是如何构思、运作和发展的。完成了对这些框架的荟萃分析。设计/方法论/方法-该方法包括五个阶段:系统但重点突出的文献综述,以确定相关框架;对选定的框架进行研究,以便设计框架风格的类型学,以便采用类似风格的框架可以进行比较和分析;将框架按家庭分组,处理关系形成、运作和发展过程中的不同方面;使用这些家庭群体中的类型(来自类型学),通过确定共同或对比的主题来促进对每个群体的元分析;并得出总体观察结果……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of ICT outsourcing among the locally-owned manufacturers in Malaysia ISO 37500 – Comparing outsourcing life-cycle models An exploratory study on the impact of recruitment process outsourcing on employer branding of an organisation Local industry technological capability development using outsourcing opportunities Servitization in contract manufacturing – evidence from Polar business cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1