A Comparative Analysis of E-Governance and IT Governance

Monica Nehemia, I. Shaanika, T. Iyamu
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of E-Governance and IT Governance","authors":"Monica Nehemia, I. Shaanika, T. Iyamu","doi":"10.1109/OI.2019.8908186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many organisations, the deployment of information technologies (IT) encounters various challenges such as processes redesign, infrastructure redundancy, and lack of alignment between business processes and IT artefacts. These challenges impede organisations productivity and competitiveness. As a means to mitigate against the challenges, approaches, such as e-governance and IT governance have been employed and practised in some organisations over the years. However, the e-governance and IT governance brings about more complication through their conflicting and duplicating functions in their deployment and use, which is often caused by inability to draw distinction between the two approaches. The implication of the challenges includes the fact that it hampers selection, implementation, use and management of information systems and technologies (IS/IT) artefacts within an organisation. The challenges are more common in developing countries such as Namibia, owing to the newness of the concept in the environment. Thus, this study employed a desk research approach to understand the implication of practice in the interchangeable use of the terms. A total of 52 articles were collected. The keywords egovernance and IT governance) were used as the main search criteria (. All articles were collected from accredited journals databases, such as Emerald, IEEE Explore Digital Library and Proquest. The collected articles were analysed, following the interpretive stance. From the findings, we highlight the commonality and distinction between the e-governance and IT governance. The article therefore proposes ways in which the two concepts can be employed separately or complementarily, to manage IS/IT activities and business processes without conflicts, within an environment.","PeriodicalId":330455,"journal":{"name":"2019 Open Innovations (OI)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Open Innovations (OI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OI.2019.8908186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In many organisations, the deployment of information technologies (IT) encounters various challenges such as processes redesign, infrastructure redundancy, and lack of alignment between business processes and IT artefacts. These challenges impede organisations productivity and competitiveness. As a means to mitigate against the challenges, approaches, such as e-governance and IT governance have been employed and practised in some organisations over the years. However, the e-governance and IT governance brings about more complication through their conflicting and duplicating functions in their deployment and use, which is often caused by inability to draw distinction between the two approaches. The implication of the challenges includes the fact that it hampers selection, implementation, use and management of information systems and technologies (IS/IT) artefacts within an organisation. The challenges are more common in developing countries such as Namibia, owing to the newness of the concept in the environment. Thus, this study employed a desk research approach to understand the implication of practice in the interchangeable use of the terms. A total of 52 articles were collected. The keywords egovernance and IT governance) were used as the main search criteria (. All articles were collected from accredited journals databases, such as Emerald, IEEE Explore Digital Library and Proquest. The collected articles were analysed, following the interpretive stance. From the findings, we highlight the commonality and distinction between the e-governance and IT governance. The article therefore proposes ways in which the two concepts can be employed separately or complementarily, to manage IS/IT activities and business processes without conflicts, within an environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子政务与信息技术治理的比较分析
在许多组织中,信息技术(IT)的部署遇到各种挑战,例如流程重新设计、基础设施冗余以及业务流程和IT工件之间缺乏一致性。这些挑战阻碍了组织的生产力和竞争力。多年来,一些组织采用了电子政务和信息技术治理等方法来缓解这些挑战。然而,由于电子政务和IT治理在部署和使用过程中功能的冲突和重复,导致了更多的复杂性,这往往是由于无法区分这两种方法造成的。挑战的含义包括这样一个事实,即它阻碍了组织内信息系统和技术(IS/ it)工件的选择、实施、使用和管理。这种挑战在纳米比亚等发展中国家更为普遍,因为这一概念在环境方面是新的。因此,本研究采用桌面研究方法来了解术语互换使用中实践的含义。共收集文献52篇。关键词电子治理和IT治理)被用作主要搜索条件(。所有文章均从Emerald、IEEE Explore Digital Library和Proquest等权威期刊数据库中收集。根据解释立场对收集到的文章进行了分析。根据研究结果,我们强调了电子治理和IT治理之间的共性和区别。因此,本文提出了可以单独或互补地使用这两个概念的方法,以便在一个环境中管理没有冲突的IS/IT活动和业务流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Efficiency Improvements in a Microbrewery in South Africa Analysis of power systems faults with the integration of renewable energy sources Development and performance evaluation of a standing-wave thermo-acoustic engine Energy Monitoring for Potential Cost Saving in a Typical South African Household A Review of Wavelet Transform based Techniques for Denoising Latent Fingerprint Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1