{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of E-Governance and IT Governance","authors":"Monica Nehemia, I. Shaanika, T. Iyamu","doi":"10.1109/OI.2019.8908186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many organisations, the deployment of information technologies (IT) encounters various challenges such as processes redesign, infrastructure redundancy, and lack of alignment between business processes and IT artefacts. These challenges impede organisations productivity and competitiveness. As a means to mitigate against the challenges, approaches, such as e-governance and IT governance have been employed and practised in some organisations over the years. However, the e-governance and IT governance brings about more complication through their conflicting and duplicating functions in their deployment and use, which is often caused by inability to draw distinction between the two approaches. The implication of the challenges includes the fact that it hampers selection, implementation, use and management of information systems and technologies (IS/IT) artefacts within an organisation. The challenges are more common in developing countries such as Namibia, owing to the newness of the concept in the environment. Thus, this study employed a desk research approach to understand the implication of practice in the interchangeable use of the terms. A total of 52 articles were collected. The keywords egovernance and IT governance) were used as the main search criteria (. All articles were collected from accredited journals databases, such as Emerald, IEEE Explore Digital Library and Proquest. The collected articles were analysed, following the interpretive stance. From the findings, we highlight the commonality and distinction between the e-governance and IT governance. The article therefore proposes ways in which the two concepts can be employed separately or complementarily, to manage IS/IT activities and business processes without conflicts, within an environment.","PeriodicalId":330455,"journal":{"name":"2019 Open Innovations (OI)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Open Innovations (OI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OI.2019.8908186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In many organisations, the deployment of information technologies (IT) encounters various challenges such as processes redesign, infrastructure redundancy, and lack of alignment between business processes and IT artefacts. These challenges impede organisations productivity and competitiveness. As a means to mitigate against the challenges, approaches, such as e-governance and IT governance have been employed and practised in some organisations over the years. However, the e-governance and IT governance brings about more complication through their conflicting and duplicating functions in their deployment and use, which is often caused by inability to draw distinction between the two approaches. The implication of the challenges includes the fact that it hampers selection, implementation, use and management of information systems and technologies (IS/IT) artefacts within an organisation. The challenges are more common in developing countries such as Namibia, owing to the newness of the concept in the environment. Thus, this study employed a desk research approach to understand the implication of practice in the interchangeable use of the terms. A total of 52 articles were collected. The keywords egovernance and IT governance) were used as the main search criteria (. All articles were collected from accredited journals databases, such as Emerald, IEEE Explore Digital Library and Proquest. The collected articles were analysed, following the interpretive stance. From the findings, we highlight the commonality and distinction between the e-governance and IT governance. The article therefore proposes ways in which the two concepts can be employed separately or complementarily, to manage IS/IT activities and business processes without conflicts, within an environment.
在许多组织中,信息技术(IT)的部署遇到各种挑战,例如流程重新设计、基础设施冗余以及业务流程和IT工件之间缺乏一致性。这些挑战阻碍了组织的生产力和竞争力。多年来,一些组织采用了电子政务和信息技术治理等方法来缓解这些挑战。然而,由于电子政务和IT治理在部署和使用过程中功能的冲突和重复,导致了更多的复杂性,这往往是由于无法区分这两种方法造成的。挑战的含义包括这样一个事实,即它阻碍了组织内信息系统和技术(IS/ it)工件的选择、实施、使用和管理。这种挑战在纳米比亚等发展中国家更为普遍,因为这一概念在环境方面是新的。因此,本研究采用桌面研究方法来了解术语互换使用中实践的含义。共收集文献52篇。关键词电子治理和IT治理)被用作主要搜索条件(。所有文章均从Emerald、IEEE Explore Digital Library和Proquest等权威期刊数据库中收集。根据解释立场对收集到的文章进行了分析。根据研究结果,我们强调了电子治理和IT治理之间的共性和区别。因此,本文提出了可以单独或互补地使用这两个概念的方法,以便在一个环境中管理没有冲突的IS/IT活动和业务流程。