Transforming employer responsibilities: the privatisation of occupational pensions

K. Mann
{"title":"Transforming employer responsibilities: the privatisation of occupational pensions","authors":"K. Mann","doi":"10.1080/17486830902789764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of employers in providing retirement pensions in three countries that are often characterised as “liberal/Anglo” welfare regimes; the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. It will be suggested that despite some similarities, with a drift away from public welfare rights and industrial/collective rights occurring in all three, there are some differences in how this has been managed. It is suggested that welfare retrenchment and a retreat from collective rights, in both the public and industrial/occupational arenas, is not primarily about public expenditures but rather about shifting the balance of individual, state and employer rights and responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":270572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486830902789764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the role of employers in providing retirement pensions in three countries that are often characterised as “liberal/Anglo” welfare regimes; the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. It will be suggested that despite some similarities, with a drift away from public welfare rights and industrial/collective rights occurring in all three, there are some differences in how this has been managed. It is suggested that welfare retrenchment and a retreat from collective rights, in both the public and industrial/occupational arenas, is not primarily about public expenditures but rather about shifting the balance of individual, state and employer rights and responsibilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变雇主责任:职业养老金私有化
本文考察了雇主在三个通常被描述为“自由/盎格鲁”福利制度的国家提供退休金方面的作用;英国、美国和澳大利亚。本文认为,尽管三者有一些相似之处,即公益权利和产业/集体权利的偏离,但在管理方式上存在一些差异。有人建议,在公共和工业/职业领域削减福利和放弃集体权利,主要不是关于公共支出,而是关于改变个人、国家和雇主权利和责任之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the financial crisis on happiness in affluent European countries Active ageing and pensions in the European Union Time and punishment: a comparison of UK and US time bank use in criminal justice systems Historical perspectives on North Korea: a brief introduction and bibliography Income inequality and its driving forces in transitional countries: evidence from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1