Assessing the Quality of Software Requirements Specifications

E. Knauss, C. Boustani
{"title":"Assessing the Quality of Software Requirements Specifications","authors":"E. Knauss, C. Boustani","doi":"10.1109/RE.2008.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software requirements specifications (SRS) are hard to compare due to the uniqueness of the projects they were created in. In practice this means that it is not possible to objectively determine if a projects SRS fails to reach a certain quality threshold. Therefore, a commonly agreed-on quality model is needed. Additionally, a large set of empirical data is needed to establish a correlation between project success and quality levels. As there is no such quality model, we had to define our own based on the goal-question-metric (GQM) method. Based on this we analyzed more than 40 software projects (student projects in undergraduate software engineering classes), in order to contribute to the empirical part. This paper contributes in three areas: Firstly, we outline our GQM plan and our set of metrics. They were derived from widespread literature, and hence could lead to a discussion of how to measure requirements quality. Practitioners and researchers can profit from our experience, when measuring the quality of their requirements. Secondly, we present our findings. We hope that others find these valuable when comparing them to their own results. Finally,we show that the results of our quality assessment correlate to project success. Thus, we give an empirical indication for the correlation of requirements engineering and project success.","PeriodicalId":340621,"journal":{"name":"2008 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2008.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Software requirements specifications (SRS) are hard to compare due to the uniqueness of the projects they were created in. In practice this means that it is not possible to objectively determine if a projects SRS fails to reach a certain quality threshold. Therefore, a commonly agreed-on quality model is needed. Additionally, a large set of empirical data is needed to establish a correlation between project success and quality levels. As there is no such quality model, we had to define our own based on the goal-question-metric (GQM) method. Based on this we analyzed more than 40 software projects (student projects in undergraduate software engineering classes), in order to contribute to the empirical part. This paper contributes in three areas: Firstly, we outline our GQM plan and our set of metrics. They were derived from widespread literature, and hence could lead to a discussion of how to measure requirements quality. Practitioners and researchers can profit from our experience, when measuring the quality of their requirements. Secondly, we present our findings. We hope that others find these valuable when comparing them to their own results. Finally,we show that the results of our quality assessment correlate to project success. Thus, we give an empirical indication for the correlation of requirements engineering and project success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估软件需求规范的质量
由于创建软件需求规范(SRS)的项目的独特性,它们很难进行比较。在实践中,这意味着不可能客观地确定项目SRS是否未能达到某个质量阈值。因此,需要一个普遍同意的质量模型。此外,需要大量的经验数据来建立项目成功和质量水平之间的相关性。由于没有这样的质量模型,我们必须基于目标-问题-度量(GQM)方法定义我们自己的模型。在此基础上,我们分析了40多个软件项目(本科软件工程课程的学生项目),以贡献实证部分。本文在三个方面做出了贡献:首先,我们概述了我们的GQM计划和我们的度量标准集。它们来源于广泛的文献,因此可能导致关于如何度量需求质量的讨论。当测量他们需求的质量时,从业者和研究人员可以从我们的经验中获益。其次,我们提出了我们的发现。我们希望其他人在将这些结果与自己的结果进行比较时能发现它们的价值。最后,我们展示了我们的质量评估结果与项目成功相关。因此,我们给出了需求工程和项目成功的相关性的经验指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Linking Requirements and Testing in Practice Revisiting the Core Ontology and Problem in Requirements Engineering Building Contingencies into Specifications Supporting Requirements Change Management in Goal Oriented Analysis Aligning Requirements with HIPAA in the iTrust System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1