Pengujian Usability Pada Prototype Aplikasiwadaya Dengan Metode Usability Testing Mengadopsi Standar Iso 9241:11

Kadek Krisna, I. K. P. Arthana, Gede Aditra Pradnyana
{"title":"Pengujian Usability Pada Prototype Aplikasiwadaya Dengan Metode Usability Testing Mengadopsi Standar Iso 9241:11","authors":"Kadek Krisna, I. K. P. Arthana, Gede Aditra Pradnyana","doi":"10.31937/TI.V11I1.1240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to test the usability of Wadaya application prototype using usability testing method adopting ISO 9241: 11 standard. Wadaya application prototype will be tested using three usability concepts namely effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. In this research, testing will be done twice with 20 respondents. The first prototype test result shows that (1) Wadaya application prototype is still not effective seen from mistakes made by respondents when during the execution of the task. The results showed 53.57%. (2) Wadaya application prototype is not efficient seen from the result of 44% Overall Relative Efficiency. (3) Wadaya application prototype has not fulfilled user satisfaction seen from 59,00 SUS score. The second prototype test results show that (1) Wadaya application second prototype is still not effective seen from mistakes made by respondents when during the execution of the task. The results showed 19,17% for the beginner group and 25,00% for the advance group. (2) Wadaya application second prototype is not efficient seen from the result of 74% Overall Relative Efficiency. (3)Wadaya application second prototype has fulfilled the user satisfaction seen from SUS score of 69,00 which is stated have satisfied when compared with SUS standard that is 68.","PeriodicalId":347196,"journal":{"name":"Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31937/TI.V11I1.1240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to test the usability of Wadaya application prototype using usability testing method adopting ISO 9241: 11 standard. Wadaya application prototype will be tested using three usability concepts namely effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. In this research, testing will be done twice with 20 respondents. The first prototype test result shows that (1) Wadaya application prototype is still not effective seen from mistakes made by respondents when during the execution of the task. The results showed 53.57%. (2) Wadaya application prototype is not efficient seen from the result of 44% Overall Relative Efficiency. (3) Wadaya application prototype has not fulfilled user satisfaction seen from 59,00 SUS score. The second prototype test results show that (1) Wadaya application second prototype is still not effective seen from mistakes made by respondents when during the execution of the task. The results showed 19,17% for the beginner group and 25,00% for the advance group. (2) Wadaya application second prototype is not efficient seen from the result of 74% Overall Relative Efficiency. (3)Wadaya application second prototype has fulfilled the user satisfaction seen from SUS score of 69,00 which is stated have satisfied when compared with SUS standard that is 68.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用Iso 9241:11标准操作系统测试应用程序的应用原型
本研究的目的是采用ISO 9241: 11标准的可用性测试方法对Wadaya应用程序原型进行可用性测试。Wadaya应用原型将使用三个可用性概念进行测试,即有效性、效率和用户满意度。在本研究中,将对20名受访者进行两次测试。第一次原型测试结果表明:(1)从被调查者在执行任务过程中所犯的错误来看,Wadaya应用原型仍然不有效。结果为53.57%。(2)从总体相对效率44%的结果来看,Wadaya应用原型效率不高。(3)从59000个SUS评分来看,和田雅应用原型并没有达到用户满意度。第二原型测试结果表明:(1)从被调查者在执行任务过程中所犯的错误来看,Wadaya应用程序第二原型仍然不有效。结果显示,初级组为19.17%,高级组为25.00%。(2)从总体相对效率74%的结果来看,Wadaya应用程序第二原型效率不高。(3)Wadaya应用程序第二原型实现了用户满意度,从SUS得分69分来看,与SUS标准68分相比,用户满意度达到了满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Robot Framework and Cucumber as BDD Automated Testing Tools Development of a Mobile-Based Student Grade Processing Application Using the Waterfall Method Gamification to Study Machine Learning using Octalysis Framework Web-Based Writing Learning Application of Basic Hanacaraka Using Convolutional Neural Network Method Analysis of User-generated Content in Visitor Reviews of Tourist Attractions Using Semantic Similarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1