Discovering Multi-density Urban Hotspots in a Smart City

Eugenio Cesario, Paschal I. Uchubilo, Andrea Vinci, Xiaotian Zhu
{"title":"Discovering Multi-density Urban Hotspots in a Smart City","authors":"Eugenio Cesario, Paschal I. Uchubilo, Andrea Vinci, Xiaotian Zhu","doi":"10.1109/SMARTCOMP50058.2020.00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leveraged by a large-scale diffusion of sensing networks and scanning devices in modern cities, huge volumes of geo-referenced urban data are collected every day. Such amount of information is analyzed to discover data-driven models, which can be exploited to tackle the major issues that cities face, including air pollution, virus diffusion, human mobility, traffic flows. In particular, the detection of city hotspots is becoming a valuable organization technique for framing detailed knowledge of a metropolitan area, providing high-level summaries for spatial datasets, which are valuable for planners, scientists, and policymakers. However, while classic density-based clustering algorithms show to be suitable to discover hotspots characterized by homogeneous density, their application on multi-density data can produce inaccurate results. For such a reason, since metropolitan cities are heavily characterized by variable densities, multi-density clustering seems to be more appropriate to discover city hotspots. This paper presents a study about how density-based clustering algorithms are suitable for discovering urban hotspots in a city, by showing a comparative analysis of single-density and multi-density clustering on both state-of-the-art data and real-world data. The experimental evaluation shows that, in an urban scenario, multi-density clustering achieves higher quality hotspots than a single-density approach.","PeriodicalId":346827,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP50058.2020.00073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Leveraged by a large-scale diffusion of sensing networks and scanning devices in modern cities, huge volumes of geo-referenced urban data are collected every day. Such amount of information is analyzed to discover data-driven models, which can be exploited to tackle the major issues that cities face, including air pollution, virus diffusion, human mobility, traffic flows. In particular, the detection of city hotspots is becoming a valuable organization technique for framing detailed knowledge of a metropolitan area, providing high-level summaries for spatial datasets, which are valuable for planners, scientists, and policymakers. However, while classic density-based clustering algorithms show to be suitable to discover hotspots characterized by homogeneous density, their application on multi-density data can produce inaccurate results. For such a reason, since metropolitan cities are heavily characterized by variable densities, multi-density clustering seems to be more appropriate to discover city hotspots. This paper presents a study about how density-based clustering algorithms are suitable for discovering urban hotspots in a city, by showing a comparative analysis of single-density and multi-density clustering on both state-of-the-art data and real-world data. The experimental evaluation shows that, in an urban scenario, multi-density clustering achieves higher quality hotspots than a single-density approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索智慧城市中的多密度热点
随着传感网络和扫描设备在现代城市的大规模普及,每天都会收集到大量的地理参考城市数据。对如此大量的信息进行分析,以发现数据驱动的模型,可以利用这些模型来解决城市面临的主要问题,包括空气污染、病毒扩散、人员流动、交通流量。特别是,城市热点的检测正在成为一种有价值的组织技术,用于构建大都市地区的详细知识,为空间数据集提供高水平的摘要,这对规划者、科学家和决策者来说是有价值的。然而,尽管经典的基于密度的聚类算法适合于发现密度均匀的热点,但它们在多密度数据上的应用可能会产生不准确的结果。因此,由于大都市的密度变化很大,多密度集群似乎更适合发现城市热点。本文通过对最新数据和真实数据进行单密度和多密度聚类的对比分析,研究了基于密度的聚类算法如何适用于发现城市热点。实验评估表明,在城市场景下,多密度聚类比单密度聚类获得更高质量的热点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Industry 4.0 Solutions for Interoperability: a Use Case about Tools and Tool Chains in the Arrowhead Tools Project A NodeRED-based dashboard to deploy pipelines on top of IoT infrastructure Enhanced Support of LWM2M in Low Power and Lossy Networks Simulating Smart Campus Applications in Edge and Fog Computing A Scalable Distributed System for Precision Irrigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1