Toward a Political Theory of Sectarianism in the Middle East: The Salience of Authoritarianism over Theology

N. Hashemi
{"title":"Toward a Political Theory of Sectarianism in the Middle East: The Salience of Authoritarianism over Theology","authors":"N. Hashemi","doi":"10.2979/JIMS.1.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his critically acclaimed book, The Shi’a Revival: How Conflicts within Islam Will Shape the Future, Vali Nasr has suggested that traditional concepts and categories used to explicate the Middle East, such as modernity, democracy, fundamentalism and nationalism, no longer adequately explain the politics of the region. It “is rather the old feud between Shi’as and Sunnis that forges attitudes, defines prejudices, draws political boundary lines, and even decides whether and to what extent those other trends have relevance.” In keeping with this argument, President Obama has on numerous occasions invoked the phrase “ancient sectarian differences” to explain the turmoil and conflict in the Arab-Islamic world today. This raises the question how old is the feud between Shi’as and Sunnis and how far back in history can we trace the origins of sectarianism that is currently destabilizing the Middle East? Rejecting the paradigm of “ancient sectarian hatreds” this paper locates the roots of sectarian conflict in the late twentieth century and not in the seventh century. More specifically, the political context that illuminates the question of sectarianism is the persistence of authoritarianism – as the dominant feature of the politics of the Middle East – and the crisis of legitimacy facing ruling regimes that has followed as a consequence. The political mobilization and manipulation of sectarian identities, it will be argued, is a key strategy for regime survival and it is within this framework that the question of sectarianism can be better understood. Drawing on the literature of “ethnic political mobilization” and the literature in international relations that explains the regional rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the question of sectarianism will be analyzed as the function of the “broken politics” of the Middle East and not due to irreconcilable theological differences between Sunnis and Shi’as.","PeriodicalId":388440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/JIMS.1.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract:In his critically acclaimed book, The Shi’a Revival: How Conflicts within Islam Will Shape the Future, Vali Nasr has suggested that traditional concepts and categories used to explicate the Middle East, such as modernity, democracy, fundamentalism and nationalism, no longer adequately explain the politics of the region. It “is rather the old feud between Shi’as and Sunnis that forges attitudes, defines prejudices, draws political boundary lines, and even decides whether and to what extent those other trends have relevance.” In keeping with this argument, President Obama has on numerous occasions invoked the phrase “ancient sectarian differences” to explain the turmoil and conflict in the Arab-Islamic world today. This raises the question how old is the feud between Shi’as and Sunnis and how far back in history can we trace the origins of sectarianism that is currently destabilizing the Middle East? Rejecting the paradigm of “ancient sectarian hatreds” this paper locates the roots of sectarian conflict in the late twentieth century and not in the seventh century. More specifically, the political context that illuminates the question of sectarianism is the persistence of authoritarianism – as the dominant feature of the politics of the Middle East – and the crisis of legitimacy facing ruling regimes that has followed as a consequence. The political mobilization and manipulation of sectarian identities, it will be argued, is a key strategy for regime survival and it is within this framework that the question of sectarianism can be better understood. Drawing on the literature of “ethnic political mobilization” and the literature in international relations that explains the regional rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the question of sectarianism will be analyzed as the function of the “broken politics” of the Middle East and not due to irreconcilable theological differences between Sunnis and Shi’as.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向中东宗派主义的政治理论:权威主义对神学的突出作用
摘要:瓦里•纳斯尔在其广受好评的著作《什叶派复兴:伊斯兰内部冲突将如何塑造未来》中指出,用来解释中东的传统概念和类别,如现代性、民主、原教旨主义和民族主义,已不能充分解释该地区的政治。“相反,是什叶派和逊尼派之间的宿怨形成了态度,定义了偏见,划定了政治界线,甚至决定了其他趋势是否相关,以及在多大程度上相关。”为了与这一论点保持一致,奥巴马总统在许多场合援引“古老的宗派分歧”来解释当今阿拉伯-伊斯兰世界的动荡和冲突。这就提出了这样一个问题:什叶派和逊尼派之间的宿怨有多久了?我们可以追溯到历史上多远的宗派主义的起源,这种宗派主义目前正在破坏中东地区的稳定?本文摒弃了“古老的宗派仇恨”的范式,将宗派冲突的根源定位在二十世纪晚期,而不是七世纪。更具体地说,说明宗派主义问题的政治背景是威权主义的持续存在——这是中东政治的主要特征——以及随之而来的执政政权面临的合法性危机。他们认为,政治动员和宗派认同的操纵是政权生存的关键战略,在这个框架内,宗派主义问题可以得到更好的理解。借鉴“民族政治动员”的文献和解释沙特阿拉伯和伊朗之间地区竞争的国际关系文献,将宗派主义问题分析为中东“破碎政治”的功能,而不是由于逊尼派和什叶派之间不可调和的神学分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Philosophy as a ‘Resisting Identity’?: Taha Abdurrahman, Fethi al-Meskini, and Aziz al-Azmeh in Dialogue on Modernist Arab Philosophy The Transformation of the Human Self through Religious Practice in Sufism and Buddhism Curriculum Renewal for Islamic Education: Critical Perspectives on Teaching Islam in Primary and Secondary Schools (By Eds. Nadeem A. Memon, Mariam Alhashmi, and Mohamad Abdalla) The Moral and Ethical Role of Taqwa in the Personal, Social, Economic, and Political Spheres of Life in the 21st Century Islamicate Cosmopolitan Spirit (By Bruce B. Lawrence)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1