Comparing two local methods for community detection in social networks

S. Zehnalova, M. Kudelka, M. Kudelka, V. Snás̃el
{"title":"Comparing two local methods for community detection in social networks","authors":"S. Zehnalova, M. Kudelka, M. Kudelka, V. Snás̃el","doi":"10.1109/CASoN.2012.6412395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most obvious features of social networks is their community structure. Several types of methods were developed for discovering communities in the networks, either from the global perspective or based on local information only. Local methods are appropriate when working with large and dynamic networks or when real-time results are expected. In this paper we explore two such methods and compare the results obtained on the sample of a co-authorship network. We study how much may detected communities vary according to the method used for computation.","PeriodicalId":431370,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CASoN.2012.6412395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One of the most obvious features of social networks is their community structure. Several types of methods were developed for discovering communities in the networks, either from the global perspective or based on local information only. Local methods are appropriate when working with large and dynamic networks or when real-time results are expected. In this paper we explore two such methods and compare the results obtained on the sample of a co-authorship network. We study how much may detected communities vary according to the method used for computation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较社会网络中两种局部社区检测方法
社交网络最明显的特征之一是其社区结构。开发了几种类型的方法来发现网络中的社区,或者从全局角度来看,或者仅基于本地信息。当使用大型动态网络或期望实时结果时,本地方法是合适的。在本文中,我们探讨了两种这样的方法,并比较了在一个合著网络样本上获得的结果。我们根据所使用的计算方法研究可能检测到的社区变化的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Boosting Optimum-Path Forest clustering through harmony Search and its applications for intrusion detection in computer networks Graph-based cross-validated committees ensembles Automatic sentiment analysis of Twitter messages Identifying focal patterns in social networks Ontology-based Negotiation of security requirements in cloud
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1